The way was reversed, but JOSM and iD will change the oneway tag to -1 assuming that you want the direction the oneway applies to, to remain the same.

If you're reversing a way to change the direction oneway applies to, you need to keep the tag as yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174274947

Hi, is there a source for this other than the mainroads.wa.gov.au website? Our waiver only covers their CC BY 4.0 datasets, not their website.

You've also removed an offramp that is visible on ESRI World Imagery, has that actually been removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268772

More accurate data is always better than less. Individually mapped trees (regardless of amount of tags outside natural=tree) is more data than just a tree row, so we'd want to keep that. Like ArchangelEkim said, you can still add a tree row using the nodes that exist for the trees, as long as the trees remain tagged.

Hi, you've connected a sidewalk to a residential landuse area, ideally these shouldn't be connected as they are completely unrelated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174019990

Hey, a lot of these do look like they're semi-detatched houses, common in these kind of residential living areas. If you want to add a bit of extra detail, you can usually use a fence in the backyard to identify where the split between the two is, and map the two houses separately (with the one wall joining them together) if you want to. Don't feel obliged to, but it's a handy way to add a bit of extra detail!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174046445

Hi, you can square buildings in iD and JOSM using the Q key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174057102

Hi, the building=yes should only cover one building, you've extended it to cover sections that look like verandahs and grass.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174057323

I've reverted this due to the incorrect change and loss of existing data

changeset/174042290

Hi, you've accidentally dragged a node that's part of a multipolygon onto Ocean Road, I've fixed this up for you in changeset/174001668
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173957725

Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

changeset/174001213

Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

changeset/174001213

Hi, the parking area in this changeset needs to be drawn correctly, you've left it mis-shapen.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173975606

Hi, you've dragged a node and disconnected two buildings that are actually connected, I've reverted this changeset. Please ensure that you don't map incorrectly just to fix a MapRoulette problem.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976061

Hi, these buildings would likely still be intersecting as they are still overlapping. The Priceline probably needs to be changed to not be tagged as a standalone building, either with indoor mapping tags or by removing the building tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976219

Hi, you've removed a significant amount of information with this, as well as incorrectly drawn these buildings as one. I'll revert this change, please make sure you don't remove valid information just to fix a MapRoulette challenge.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976326

Hi, the amenity=veterinary tag should only be on the node for the clinic itself, not the building way. You can add extra details to the building way like clarifying what type of building, but the double amenity=veterinary is a duplication of the same information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173942227

Hi, the tags didn't need to be removed, just the way with oneway=-1 needed to be changed to oneway=yes, and reversed if necessary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173832671

Removed in changeset/173859225

Hi, were each of these checked before making this change? It seems like you have, but an edit focused on a couple of tags and this wide often ends up being an automated edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173683055

Hi, when adding links to OSM, please don't add utm tags to the URL
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173697868