@dmjab13, it's a revert of a number of changesets, these changesets often end up large just because it's quite time consuming to break them down geographically, or because one of the original changesets is large.

Hi, only one end of this road is attached to the actual road. I'd also recommend combining the short segment with the larger one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173331238

Please discuss this with the community on the most recent changeset regarding that object (other than this one), or on the community forum.

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

Hi ZLima12,

If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth.

I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi matthewfecica,

If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth.

I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi, same as my comment on the other changeset, but in this case I'd separate the building out into it's own object with just building=yes, and remove it from the outside way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172938812

Hi, the building=yes tag should only be added if the way just marks the building. I'd recommend shrinking the way to just the building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172938866

Can you please leave a more descriptive changeset comment than just Edits, a brief explanation of what you did is all that's needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172790222

This should also be highway=service, not highway=unclassified.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172811719

It's definitely R1, I'm wondering if it's part of two routes then. I'll check DataSA at some point, there's a routes dataset in there.

I'll have to double check with an allowed data source or in person, but I believe A5 actually goes along Greenhill Road for a small portion, until the Goodwood Road intersection. The section you've removed definitely looks like it was mistakenly added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172661279

Hey, same point as my other comment, is there a reason why service=alley was removed from what looks exactly like an alleyway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172545259