This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

If this is now a through road open to the public, you'll need to remove access=private.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745524

Hi, you'd generally want to place the node inside of the building, not on the building. The opening hours also need be for office, not the business as a whole. Is this office open for anyone to walk into?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169712443

Hi, phone numbers in OSM have to be formatted a certain way, for landlines it would be +61 8 8113 3240 for this object, and an example for mobiles would be +61 400 123 456.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169713829

Hi, oneway=no is implied by the lack of a oneway=yes tag, there isn't really a need to tag it unless it's a single lane road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169701136

Hi Brareu68, phone numbers need to be formatted in a certain way on OSM, for landlines it will be +61 8 8595 5796 for this one, and an example for mobiles would be +61 412 345 678.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169642493

Hi, have you checked if any of these are already mapped as relations, as per my comment on your Nepean Bay changeset?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169530829

Hi, Nepean Bay is already mapped as relation/6669182, you could add this as a label node in that relation as per osm.wiki/Relation:boundary
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536327

osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

Hi there, when you're editing items that already exist, it's best to keep the existing item and change it, instead of deleting it and creating a new version. I can see a couple of paths that have been deleted and new ones mapped along the same route.

(translated with DeepL)

Здравствуйте, при редактировании уже существующих элементов лучше сохранить существующий элемент и изменить его, а не удалять и создавать новую версию. Я вижу несколько путей, которые были удалены, и новые, нанесенные на карту по тому же маршруту.

Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here.

Can you please explain your edits here. While the construction items you removed aren't visible on aerial imagery, the items you have added also don't reflect on aerial imagery.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated with deepl)

안녕하세요,

데이터 작업 그룹의 앤드루입니다.

여기서 진행하신 편집 내용을 설명해 주시겠어요? 제거하신 건설 관련 항목들은 항공 사진에 표시되지 않지만, 추가하신 항목들도 항공 사진에 반영되지 않고 있습니다.

감사합니다,
앤드루 웰치, OSMF 데이터 작업 그룹

Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here.

Can you please explain your edits here. While the construction items you removed aren't visible on aerial imagery, the items you have added also don't reflect on aerial imagery.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated with deepl)

안녕하세요,

데이터 작업 그룹의 앤드루입니다.

여기서 진행하신 편집 내용을 설명해 주시겠어요? 제거하신 건설 관련 항목들은 항공 사진에 표시되지 않지만, 추가하신 항목들도 항공 사진에 반영되지 않고 있습니다.

감사합니다,
앤드루 웰치, OSMF 데이터 작업 그룹

If it is a waterway, it might be better to revert/remap this but tag it correctly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169433743