Hi there,

Has the actual road been changed physically in any way? If not, I think these should still be service toads, potentially marked as service=alley too. highway=service doesn't indicate a privately owned road.

access=private should also be remove from Little Winwood Street and Queen Street if they're now public roads too.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166898383

Also, a link to Google Drive likely isn't going to work for an image, you're best to link to an image on your website.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857281

access=* has a bit of a better description, but the general consensus for Australia is access=private is preferred over access=no in the majority of cases.

Hey, the paths you've set as access=no, are these the SA Water access tracks? If so, they should be access=private. access=no means no access whatsoever, access=private indicates that they're only allowed to be used with express permission, which is usually more accurate in these situations, since access=no means even SA Water can't use them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166691691

It's not the end of the world really, someone might come along afterwards and merge some of them back together but that shouldn't be a problem.

If you're interested in doing more OSM editing then learning JOSM is definitely worth a try!

Ahh I've just realised you were using relatify, that might be why it was doing that! I might report that upstream.

Usually I've just used JOSM for PT routes, but it's a bit more complex of course.

Hi, just wondering if there's a reason why some roads have been split into so many individual sections? It's not obvious from a quick look, and if there's no tagging difference or splits needed to make a relation work, it's better to leave it as one longer section.

If you mean Google Street View, that isn't a source we can use. There might be imagery on Bing Streetside, or on sources like Mapillary, Mapilio or KartaView that we're allowed to use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166600941

Hi, bitumen seal should still be marked as asphalt, thats the tag OSM uses for all forms of bitumen. I'd check out the page for the surface tag on the wiki for more information.

Hey there, surface=bitumen isn't usually used, surface=asphalt is what generally gets used instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328129

Hi, as per previous comments, a number of these tracks appear to go straight through tree areas, can you please review these before adding more, otherwise I will likely revert all these edits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166531703

Reverted incorrect golf edits

changeset/166522185

Reverted incorrect golf edits

changeset/166522185

Reverted incorrect golf edits

changeset/166522185

Hi, a number of these tracks go straight through wooded areas, can you please review this and accurately trace the tracks?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166487955

Hi, there's already a path that follows very closely to the way you've edited, are these the same track or are there just two in really close proximity that repeatedly cross over?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166451236

Partially reverted in changeset/166463240

Reverted in changeset/166463240

Wrong node? It's on the corner of a building
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166417127

Hi, you've dragged the sidewalk/footpath way to go across the college.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166200354