Yeah Bing usually tends to be a little behind, ESRI tends to be a little more up to date at least, just lower quality in more urban areas.

Bing shows the parts of Berrimah Road that you've marked as construction, as existing roads. Have those roads been removed in order to be rebuilt?

Sweet thanks!

I've added the turn:lanes tags in changeset/144603579

The turn lanes were moved to only be where they were physically separate. If I didn’t add turn:lanes tags to show the turn lanes while they’re part of the main way I’ll go back and add those in when I have a chance.

Hi, you've changed the address of this node, however this does not update the location. Can you please move the node to the correct location?

Hey, the addr:street tag you've added doesn't match any of the street names nearby and also includes a number, I can see you've tagged 1/2 as Waikiki Court, any chance you can confirm that 1/1 should also be tagged as such/fix it?

Hey, you've actually set addr:street for this node to 17, can you confirm if it's actually Wyatt Road/edit it to fix that?

There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

Hi there, you've made a few edits of objects and then deleted them, are these real objects?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144575367

Hi there, name should only be used for real names for things, if this area has a real name then please add it to the name tag, otherwise I'd remove template from it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530271

I guessed as much, thanks for fixing it!

Should The Overland really be tagged as service=commuter? I would have thought servce=long_distance
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144414628

Plus, how it renders here is not how every other renderer will render. osm.org is designed for mappers, not for map viewers.

Razed is generally used for when there is some kind of remaining track of some sort showing where the tram line is, or if mapping is out of date to what's in real life and still shows the track. If the tram track no longer exists, it should be deleted. If OpenRailwayMap needs that information, they'd need to consider a combination of data from OSM and from another source like OpenHistoryMap.

Hi there, the imagery you've used does not show tram lines where you've mentioned, are you able to let me know where these are sourced from? You've mentioned that these are former tram lines, and they appear to no longer exist in any form, so they shouldn't be mapped.

How it shows on maps is up to the renderer, and mapping/tagging for renderers is frowned upon. If they don't show an alt_name or allow searching for alt_name tags, that's on them, but the OSM data itself should just reflect the truth, which is the name K'gari.

Have you got a source for this change at all? The official name in all sources I can find is K'gari, and Fraser Island is already listed as an alt_name.

"Therefore, highway=primary_link should be used on a slip road/ramp which connects a highway=primary to a secondary, tertiary, or other minor highway."

How I read it is that it doesn't mention direction, just the classes of roads.