Hi ZLima12,

If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth.

I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi matthewfecica,

If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth.

I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi, same as my comment on the other changeset, but in this case I'd separate the building out into it's own object with just building=yes, and remove it from the outside way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172938812

Hi, the building=yes tag should only be added if the way just marks the building. I'd recommend shrinking the way to just the building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172938866

Can you please leave a more descriptive changeset comment than just Edits, a brief explanation of what you did is all that's needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172790222

This should also be highway=service, not highway=unclassified.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172811719

It's definitely R1, I'm wondering if it's part of two routes then. I'll check DataSA at some point, there's a routes dataset in there.

I'll have to double check with an allowed data source or in person, but I believe A5 actually goes along Greenhill Road for a small portion, until the Goodwood Road intersection. The section you've removed definitely looks like it was mistakenly added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172661279

Hey, same point as my other comment, is there a reason why service=alley was removed from what looks exactly like an alleyway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172545259

Hey, any reason why service=alley was removed from these? They all seem like alleyways based on both the wiki definition and how alleyways are mapped around SA.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172545397

Hey there, just a couple of tips:

If you're adding a bunch of houses in a similar area, it's easier for all to do them within the same changeset.

For addresses in Australia, you don't need to enter the suburb, postcode or state. We have those fully mapped through relations, so adding them onto individual items duplicates that data. No major harm in adding them, but it can save time to just skip them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172594095

This should be highway=service, not highway=residential.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172437773

Hi, just wondering what the source is for this data?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172381935

Hi, is this a location someone can come to during your opening hours?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172289906

Shouldn't this be disused:amenity=post_office instead of amenity=disused:post_office?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171988421

access=yes is usually the default assumed permission anyway, all this change does is take it from an explicit access=yes to an implicit access=yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171961143

You've removed the name from these bus stops, and the ref from one, and turned them into fitness stations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171858562

Hi, it looks like this actually loops around to meet the main road again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171799396

The driveway also only connects to the sidewalk, and not to the road. Uber editors have continuously made these mistakes while editing in Australia recently, please review all your recent edits and ensure these issues are fixed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171801167

This is misaligned and doesn't cover the whole driveway, can you please review this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171722745