This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change

Can you also make sure that this is done for all the other edits you've done alongside this as well.

Those edits are so far back that we can't know for sure what the source was, but if they've remained in OSM, then there's a decent chance they're valid.

Please don't do any more find and replace edits like this without discussion, as per the automated edits code of conduct. Even if you're manually doing it, it still counts, and that discussion would have ensured that the correct replacement tags were found.

See osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for more information.

If those changes weren't verified in some way, these changesets should be reverted for breach of AECOC.

How did you verify that this petrol station doesn't serve food and that HGVs are not permitted to enter, outside of the existing amenity:restaurant and amenity:truck_stop tags? Because if all you did was search and replace those tags, that's explicitly listed as an automated edit.

That's not the only tag I'm concerned about, plus the HGV tag is about whether they're allowed there or not.

Did you verify that each of these stations does not allow HGVs to enter, and that they don't serve food at all? If not, you've done an automated edit without consultation and this should all be reverted.

The brand changes are usually just rebrands, the stations themselves stay the same. However, the main concern was the tags that you changed, where the meaning of the old tag isn't the same as the new one. If you haven't verified those changes, they should be reverted.

Definitely seems like a mass (incorrect) re-tag across multiple changesets without any actual verification.

Does the lack of a truck stop mean trucks can't pull into here? And the lack of a restaurant doesn't necessarily mean food isn't available. I think this (and any other edits like this) should be reverted, as they seem like a mechanical edit without a review.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170982586

Also, is Waverly Orthopaedic Clinic really a hospital, or is there a better tag for this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701905

Revert SEO edits added to whole building

changeset/170695564