Hey, you've added addr:housenumber as "a" here, was that intentional?

Not sure whether the road way is wrong or the Liberty is wrong, but the street names don't match up, Claire vs Clare. Do you know which one is correct?

Hi, you changed the address of node/12417453546 to 9 Twynam Road, was this a mistake? The node is a couple of streets over on Coil Way
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165315769

Hi there, those guidelines are just recommendations, not hard guidelines. Changing this to tertiary while keeping the northern part as secondary is quite odd as well.

If it definitely meets the critera for a tertiary road more than a secondary road (excluding what WA Mainroads says), that's fine, but I'd recommend also updating the section immediately north of this one.

Should way/32805950 and way/998301746 be highway=trunk? I would have thought it would be secondary since both Gladstone Road and Jones Road are highway=secondary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165313043

Hi, this line isn't a road, it's part of an administrative boundary border. I've removed the tags from it, you'll want to add those tags to the ways for the roads themselves.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165307626

Hey Mateusz! It is a clothing screen printer, I wasn't too sure what it specifically was and that's the tag Every Door adds in that scenario and I was going to come back to it today but didn't get a chance. Don't think shop=clothes would really match, it's not somewhere you can just go in and walk out with a shirt, but there is a physical presence you could go in and see them and collect orders.

Happy for any recommendations, otherwise I'll dig around the wiki and TagInfo when I have a moment.

Hi, you accidentally moved the Oporto node here, plus there's no changes to Metro Parade in this changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165170896

Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here,

Can you please explain these edits, as they appear to just be adding random nodes with no description?

If there's no explanation, these and your other changes may be reverted.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Mapping it as it exists is the best way to do that, which would probably be to keep the ways there, but tag them to reflect that it's not actually part of Frenchmens Road and that it's private.

You'd have to ask whoever mapped it as such, if you check the history of that item, you'll be able to see that changeset, and you can comment on it.

For private property, you'd tag it as access=private.
Driveways get mapped as people choose to, someone most likely was mapping the area and saw it on aerial imagery and drew it in.

I'm part of the Data Working Group as a volunteer moderator, however I commented on this outside of that role.

There's a note on the highway=residential section that does mention that it differs from the road reserve in the DCS NSW base map, however what's there is what's been mapped. YOu've also removed a driveway that does exist from the looks of aerial imagery, and should still remain, but be marked as access=private.

Hi, if this is actually private property, the ways should remain and be tagged as such. You've removed a segment and left another part named Frenchmens Road disconnected from other roadways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165008766

Hi, can you explain the length meter and Point_Fid tags you're adding to these ways, as well as all the nodes you've deleted?

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 164997178, 165004309, 165005104, 165005175, 165005299, 165005788.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing