Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

changeset/164233798

Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

changeset/164233798

Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

changeset/164233798

Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

changeset/164233798

Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

changeset/164233798

Regardless of the size, if the lane exists and is marked (as per the aerial imagery your edit says you've used) then it is okay to have in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164231580

Hi, instead of access=no, the better way would be to just tag bicycle=no and horse=no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164231460

Hi there, if tracks are on private land, they should be marked as such (access=private), not removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164231295

Hi, if the lanes exist for part of it, the road should be split and tagged to represent what is there. Even if vehicles are allowed to park there, the tagging should represent that the bike lane is conditional.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164231208

Hi, access=no means access in general is illegal. This is also a track, not a residential road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164230768

Hi, you've removed this from being a road route, this has nothing to do with being a bike route.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164230586

Also just wondering, is Selgar Avenue Link Road signposted, DataSA's Roads dataset has it as just Selgar Link.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164148896

Hi, the new highway way here doesn't seem to match up to the imagery listed as used.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164192709

These are legitimate, there's a major public works project in this area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164148896

Hey there, good work! I'd recommend pressing the Q button after drawing a building to square it off, and the only other recommendation would be that some of the buildings you've tagged as building=garage might be better off as building=shed (for example way/1371951932), if you're not sure whether it's one or the other you can just leave it as building=yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164145846

Hey, I'm not quite sure if this a building from the looks of it, it could possibly be a sun shade on a playground. Might be worth checking if there's any street level imagery you can use to confirm.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164126307

Hey, this should be highway=unclassified, it's the same level as residential but where the primary use isn't for access to housing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164126376

For the parking area, the highway=service way should continue through the parking area, not end at the edges of it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163981873

Hey, if you're not sure what the name is, you should delete the tag, not set it to unknown
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163977628

Hi, just wondering what the source is for this and other similar edits?