We can't use Google Street View as a source, if you've had someone verify it manually and you can tell it's where it is using an allowed source (Bing Streetside, Kartaview or Mapillary) then that's fine, but if not then that's a problem.

Hey, just wondering what street level imagery provider you used? It's best to specify which one so people can reference it if needed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146427489

Perfect, and even more detailed info, even better!

All good, best to quickly double check you've got the right one when grabbing info from websites, just to be safe!

Have you got a source for the name change, all the signage I've seen near here recently is just St Andrews Hospital
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146401742

Hi Chrisbee2, the name tag should only be used for real names of things. Are these also notable enough to be tagged as tourist attractions? There's nothing around them other than what looks like 4WD tracks.

The better way to tag this would be access=no and bus=yes or bus=designated if it's signed for buses. The bus tag would override the access=no tag for just buses. I've updated this already for you, but just for future reference.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146385364

If the street art isn't there, this should just be removed, the grass isn't heart shaped
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146384942

You had Rd not Road, names should always be written fully, and not shortened to Rd or St for example

Hey, phone numbers should be formatted as +61 8 8278 3392, I've updated this one for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146358534

Joeydd, do you have a source for this change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146339153

Hi there, addr:street tags shouldn't be abbreviated, I've corrected the tag for this changeset.

Hi there, addr:street tags shouldn't be abbreviated, I've corrected the tag for this changeset.

Hi elipoloos, ways 1239370889 and 1239370887 appear to be overlapping, if these are two buildings they should be mapped individually and have no overlap.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146210108

way/1240077531 looks to be more than a singular house, this should be split into two ways if this is the case
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146308328

railway=tram_level_crossing shouldn't be placed on traffic lights, it should only be on nodes where a tram line and a highway intersect.

Reverted changeset, road is part of bicycle network, no signage on most recent streetview, no comment after 1 week

changeset/146264991

This is the only changeset comment they've made in over a year. @DBCA, please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for why you shouldn't just be putting "area control" for your changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146119166

I have to agree with ouchjars, unless there is signage prohibiting cycling on the road (from memory there isn't but it would be good to confirm) then we shouldn't put bicycle=no. Recent Kartaview images don't show any signs preventing cycling, and this road (as well as the cycling track alongside) are part of Bike Direct. I think this changeset needs to be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145943837

Changeset reverted, please tag the specific house, not the landuse=residential area.

changeset/145821107