Or, someone may have tagged a horse_stile as a stile, especially if they're a new mapper; and/or they may be a horse-rider who assumes that 'stile' on a bridleway will always mean a horse-stile, not the other sort. That would mean the error correction is [ barrier=stile > =horse_stile }, rather than moving or deleting.

Have you looked through the history of the stiles to see whether they were added before, after, or with the bridleway designation? That may help explain why they were there.

Do the changesets give a source? I would be very, very wary of making this sort of bulk edit in any case, but if the stiles were added with "survey" as the source, I would absolutely go and revert.

Thanks. Should I reckon on deleting those untagged ways, or leave them there in case needed for a relation again?

oh, one more adjacent to that one. way/145079387

Hi VLD165, I've noticed a line without tags which may have resulted from your 'repaired relation' changeset at north Oundle. Possibly it's not an error, but one of the error-checking programs is flagging it up: way/145036620

Hi, I'm wondering about the two letter slots PE1 134 and PE1 1340. Are these the double cast-iron post box aligned with the western edge of the Guildhall? They're shown within a bldg atm but I'm not aware of any within a bldg around there. Can I safely move the postbox to this node here? node/8138784272

Hi, this changeset has resulted in overlapping railway landuse areas - New England North area way/813426890

Would I be right to shift the boundaries of the un-named railway corridor zones so that they abut but don't lie over your New England North area? I infer New Eng North is the points system?

Thanks!

Hi Andy,

This changeset includes 'Prest House NT' at node/2470053447

The National Trust website has this as 'The Priest's House' and I was considering changing it. Wasn't sure if Prest House was a typo, or possibly an alternative name. Do you recall from 7 years ago?

Cheers,

eteb3

Hi, there is a barrier=boom at node/1494109581

Is this a barrier=lift_gate , a 'lifting boom'? (barrier=lift_gate)

If so could I change the tag because barrier=boom is also used for a floating boom on a waterway: eg, way/363050752

Hi
Wondered if you recall the source of the ncn_ref=63 tag on Bluebell Bridge. (It shows up blue on the cycle layer with my note on it: changeset/16438666)
It's something of an outlier as it's unconnected with any other NCN. I haven't ground surveyed and could if that's going to decide it. Also I guess the question may be nugatory given that Sustrans have decommissioned ncn63 Peterborough to Stamford.
Thoughts welcome! Thanks. Eteb3

Hola Pablo. Gracias por haber añadido este viario. b_d_r ha hecho una pregunta sobre acceso por la carretera aquí https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67812

Sabes cuando es descubierto y posible utilizarlo? Hay una manera saberlo por referencia a una regla o calendario, p. ej., lo cual podría codificarse en los atributos? O tal vez es totalmente impredecible?

Gracias por tu ayuda: es un caso interesante!

How's this Natasha?
changeset/76056105

Oh hang on, well spotted: that node seems to be blocking Western Avenue as well as the turn into Acacia Avenue: that's definitely not the case.

I think this was an iD thing: it must have snapped the node that I intended to block Acacia Ave only onto the junction.

To be clear: there is now, following the redevelopment, no turn into Acacia Ave from Western Ave from either direction.

I'll have a look at how that should be mapped, but if you get this in the mean time and would like to give me some pointers, please do.

Hello, that was a survey: there is a new health centre and a new housing development (also marked), and as part of that redevelopment they have put a bike-permeable barrier at this junction (around August if I recall correctly). My guess is that your data is a little old - that or the local rude-boys have flattened the bollards!

Hi again jpennycook,

I added access=yes to the gate at the Woodcroft crossing, and only then thought to check back through the history. It appears you added had access=yes before, then in a later change you had removed it. Was that accidental or was there a survey reason? I haven't been through that way since I think last summer (could have been this summer!) and maybe things have changed.

Or, maybe as it's a request crossing, and slow, it makes sense to show it as access=no.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

eteb3

Hi Risteárd,

I was looking at values of denomination= and see you switched sunni to Sufi here. Could I ask why? From the website I'd guess the vast majority of the congregation would want to call themselves sunnis.

To be fair I think the tag is unhelpful: 'sufi' sticks out like a sore thumb in the list of 'denominations':
denomination=*#Islamic_denominations
Sufism is about inward spirituality whereas all the others are about intellectual creed.

Would value your thoughts.

eteb3

Hi Andy

Thanks for improving the map.

Could I check: is the vicarage used for actual services, or is it the residence of the vicar (or perhaps something else)?

eteb3

Hi Phillip,
I'm surveying Sutton (Peterborough) at the moment in dribs and drabs.

I've put a note where your possible pipeline crosses a road junction:
note/1908408

Are there things to look out for on the ground if I'm to confirm that your water pipeline runs that way?
Thanks

Ah yes, I see that's in the window. I think that's an advert for their wares, rather than a name. FHRS has yet another name. (And they're trying to sell the lease so may change again soon...)

Thanks for scraping up lots of my nameless POIs in this changeset.

Re 'Fresh Nata', is this from an eyeball survey? That one I intentionally left without a name as there's nothing above the door (that I could see).

Makes sense, I see what you mean. I'd assumed centre-of-channel in line with default land ownership rules. Will have a go this weekend - but if I forget feel free!