Thanks for the feedback.

I do not really see how you removed a relation because of low-quality but then leave part of it because it can be useful to other mappers, are these parts then of higher quality?

I would opt to remove them also or undo this change. You can find a list of the ways here: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=11&lat=61.8572&lon=27.3995&item=1140&level=1%2C2%2C3

On the greenness: I did compare the area with Google Earth and Google Earth looks much greener to me. Good luck replacing the data, do you have more accurate data at hand? I do not see mapper fixing all landuse by hand.

Greetings,

Martin.

Hi Larmax,

In this changeset you removed a big relation and that triggered Osmose warnings as there are now ways left without a tag that were first part of the relation, see for instance http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1140&zoom=15&lat=61.97305&lon=27.46099&level=3

It is also visible that this area has become much more white than it was before.

So was this indeed a correct change? What was bad on the import?

Thanks,

Martin.

Let me remove "cycleway:right=shared_lane", any objections?

Changed, see changeset/106245643

Ja, bedankt voor de correctie, dat was inderdaad niet goed gegaan.

Helemaal eens met bicycle:backward=use_sidepath.

ping

Hi Rob,

3 month ago I think there were more, the only one I could find now is way/13305896

Martin.

Hi Bobby,

I would appreciate to get a reaction on this.

Thanks,

Martin.

Ja, dat in inderdaad een knap onlogisch kruispunt voor fietsers, niet gezien toen ik de wijzigen maakte.

Prima dat je die mapper hebt geholpen en prima oplossing,

Bedankt!

> Sorry I’m not sure what specific segment of the road you are referring to

You can see that using the achavi link I gave, here you can find them:

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=3032&zoom=17&lat=-43.558548&lon=172.547847&level=2

Okay, I missed the oneway:bicycle=yes because the "cycleway" is mapped as highway=path as is normal in Germany.

I am used to map these paths as highway=cycleway and then the map will show an arrow indicating the direction, so yes that is something I missed.

Hi Cody,

Why did you add "bicycle=no" to Awatea Road in this changeset? The road has also cycleway=lane

See also https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96406391

Hi Antoine,

Pourquoi avez-vous ajouté "bicycle=no" et "foot=no" et "horse=no" sur la D 957 ?

Il y a "cycleway=lane"

https://imgur.com/a/K3JM7Vn

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94270826

NB: I prefer communicating in English ;-)

Hi Strubbl,

I am never blindly following a Osmose warning and correcting them, I always look into the details as there is always the choice to either correct the bicycle or the cycleway tags and if you see my commit history that differs per problem.

With the knowledge we have now you are right and I understand why you think a note would be better.

I correct a lot of these issues, but if I do not trust things I typically make a note in the commit that caused the problem and this did not look suspect like I said because on the other side of the road there is a bidirectional cycleway and CreCrePL did not look like a beginner to me.

Naar mijn idee is er in ieder geval iets te veel weg gehaald, alleen het brugdeel is weg, niet de aanbruggen en daar is wel een deel van verwijderd.

Hi Strubbl,

I see there is also a discussion on this on changeset/102796204#map=14/48.1339/11.6174 and I think that is the better place.

I did document the reason for my changes in the description and checked bicycle access is still possible as there is a bi-directional cycleway on the other side of the road.

I did react in note/2644552 but this is once more a side effect of moving the name tag from the outer way to the relation.

If you are sure things are incorrect and know how to correct it, please do so.

Hoi Jasper,

De Kabouterroute lijkt compleet maar heeft nog steeds "fixme=incomplete"

Is dat het geval of kan "fixme=incomplete" verwijderd worden?

Groeten,

Martin.

Inderdaad echt moeilijk is het niet, inmiddels weer ingecheckt: changeset/102820360

Ik denk dat beginnende mappers niet aan z'n fietsroute herleggen beginnen ;-)

Goed, bedankt voor je oplettendheid!

Leo,

Op osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter lees ik:

Do not revert changes by other users without contacting them first in a polite way and giving them enough time to reply (one week minimum). Broken data can be fixed easily, but a broken community is not so easy to restore. :)

Dat had ik liever gezien, ik had vrij makkelijk die ene weg kunnen corrigeren en rest van de data nog even dubbel nakijken. Nu is dat allemaal een stuk moeilijker geworden.