Hi there,

There's a few lane related mistakes in this changeset:

way/38893881#map=19/42.97240/-85.67731 and way/1246969374#map=19/42.97292/-85.68692 have different lane counts in lanes and turn:lanes

way/1175923333#map=19/42.97330/-85.68361 has different counts in lanes and change:lanes

way/1248279566 has different counts in lanes and destination:lanes

Could you please fix these? Thanks!

Hi there,

There's a few lane count mismatches here:
On way/1249579640, way/1249579627 and way/1249579654 the count of lanes does not match the number of lanes specified in turn:lanes

In way/1249579645#map=19/42.92780/-85.68139, the number of lanes in the lanes tag does not match the number of lanes indicated in the change:lanes tag.

Could you please fix these? Thanks!

Also, you created this relation relation/17267765#map=18/32.22669/-110.97073 which has an unclosed part. Could you also fix this? Thanks!

Hi there,

I've fixed all of these, but in the future, motor vehicle access tagging uses motor_vehicle, not motorvehicle

Hi there,

When you edited relation/1023567#map=15/32.2356/-110.9649, you added this boundary way instead of the road underneath it: way/869767616#map=19/32.22440/-110.96558

Can you please fix this? Thanks!

hi there,

Just checking in on this, can you please fix it? Thanks!

Looks like it's still on node/6086615790/history

Hi there,

Can you double check your edits on way/217570831? Looks like it's doing some weird stuff like crossing over another railway and a super sharp bend at the end. See visualization at https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/217570831

Hey there,

For the future, just because everything else has a tag doesn't necessarily mean that it's correct. You should always look at the wiki to determine whether the element fits the description of the tag. In this case, it doesn't, because there is no recreation ground in the state game area. The other state game areas were only tagged that way because someone wanted it to look better on the map

Not trying to blame you at all, just letting you know. it's a very common mistake for new mappers to make

Hi there,

Did you mean to change "cables" to "cables1" here? way/877700672

Hi there,

Looks like you accidentally added a URL as a tag on way/246557510. Could you go back and check to make sure that all the right tags are there then delete it? Thanks!

Hi there,

On ways that you created like way/1252639552, is there documentation somewhere for "crossing=traffic_controls"?

Thanks!
I'm just curious about what value you think that tag adds, given that those individual activities are already tagged as allowed (from bicycle=yes, dog=yes, piste:type=nordic, highway=path, etc) and "multi-use" would be less specific than those individual ones. It doesn't seem like there's a purpose to having it there, unless i'm missing something?

Hi there,

I see you're adding "multi-use=yes" to some of these paths. Is that meant to be a tag to say that it can be used as both a walking trail and cross country trail, or does it mean something else?

Hi there,

For way/1252192173, since the roads that it is connecting are secondary, it needs to be a secondary_link, not tertiary_link. Also the destination tag is rarely used for small link roads, but if it is, then it should be the street that it leads to, not the street it comes from

Hi there,

On way/1252169758 and way/1252169759 you added "lanes=2" but the "turn:lanes" tag indicates 3 lanes. Could you please go back and fix that so they're not conflicting? Thanks!

Hi there,

On way/1252052221 you created a oneway road with "lanes:forward" and "lanes:backward". Could you please fix that and double check the lane count is accurate? Thanks!

Hi there,

You added node/1669057374 to relation/9623418 with no role, could you please either remove the node from the relation or add a role? Thanks!

Hi there,

On node/6086615790/history and node/6116792586 you added "network:wikidata=Q3553869", however a year ago you added the tags "not:network:wikidata=Q3553869" to these nodes. Can you please double check and delete whichever of the two is incorrect? Thanks!

Hi there,

This revert deleted 82 of the 83 nodes of way/333579375, effectively deleting it from the map (visualization: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/333579375) Looks like a user had edited the road between your initial changeset and revert and you failed to handle the revert conflict correctly. I've fixed it, but in the future please double check your edits (and there's no reason for mechanical edits to span more than one state at a time)