OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
144671446 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

Looks like you have a typo on way/1228074126, I assume you meant "lanes" but I wanted to double check just in case. Would you mind taking a look?

144669258 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

On way/1228061412, oneway highways should never have :backward or :forward for lane data, the turn lane data should be in a key called "turn:lanes". Could you please fix that? Thanks!

144598394 about 2 years ago

Thanks for the quick response!

Then it would be name:signed=no, to specify that it's the name that is not signed

142321879 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

I know this is an old changeset, but I'm wondering why a lot of these roads have layer=1, like way/886888363. There doesn't seem to be any overlapping objects, so I'm not sure that they are needed

144555044 about 2 years ago

This is for:
way/1227387678#map=16/47.3621/-110.9097
way/1227387679
way/1227387677#map=19/47.35151/-110.89843
way/1227387680
way/1227387677#map=19/47.35151/-110.89843

You also need to add these to the route relations

144555044 about 2 years ago

Hi,

On highways like way/1227387677#map=19/47.35151/-110.89843, the highway numbers need to go in ref, not in name. Could you please fix this? Thanks!

144533062 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

You created way/1227284916 and tagged it landuse=retail, but landuse must be a closed area, not a line. Could you go back and fix that? Thanks!

144598394 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

on way/311206346 and way/1227638260 you put "*:signed=no", which is not a standard tag. Could you explain a bit more about what you were trying to show with this? There may be a better tagging option for it

144601752 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

I undid this changeset because it looks like something got messed up, your comment says "Added street light", but you didn't add any street lights, you deleted a road and then looks like you tried to add a crossing node, but added it to the road intersection instead of the crossing intersection.

Feel free to try it again, but remember that roads that are physically separated should be separate roads, and crossing nodes go on the intersection of the sidewalk and the road, not on the intersection of the roads. Hope this helps!

144601812 about 2 years ago

Hey there,

Could you please give a little more justification for changing these from motorway_link to motorway?

144517078 about 2 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for the additions! In OSM, street names must be spelled out in full (see osm.wiki/Abbreviations). Would you mind changing these back? Thanks!

144445513 about 2 years ago

Removed in changeset/144455452, please do not use the map for personal things

144227908 about 2 years ago

Hi,

I've fixed this one for you, but please remember to put a space between the number and mph in the future!

144038339 about 2 years ago

Okay, then you should probably update the wiki to reflect that, since right now it says that fee shouldn't be on highways

120217064 about 2 years ago

> Is it some euphemism for amenity=brothel ?

lol, no. I wasn't sure what to call it, i'm still not sure, here's the website: https://matrixentertainment.com

144038339 about 2 years ago

Hi,

Could you please explain more about why you changed toll to fee on roads? Since toll is defined as "indicating that a fee must be paid by general traffic to use a road, road bridge or road tunnel", i'm not sure how to understand your change. thanks!

144109161 about 2 years ago

Hi,

please explain what was wrong about the traffic signals? They looked correct to me

144072032 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

could you please go back to the drive through lanes like way/1223966454 and double check that they're all going in the right direction? Thanks!

144071386 about 2 years ago

Hi,

Please make sure that your changeset comments are accurate, this changeset did not do anything related to sidewalks or residential zone footprints

144033914 about 2 years ago

Hi there,

When you went to save your edits, the editor warned you that the woodland mall relation was broken. I've gone ahead and fixed it for you, since I know multipolygon work is tricky, especially when the members are a different type than the relation, but in the future if you see that warning, make sure to fix it before saving. Thanks!