OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
130832167 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Since this isn't a building, adding building:condition won't do anything. The best thing to do is either mark it as access=no or add construction tags.

131244426 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, could you please change the S to South (and fix the typo)? Thanks!

131471158 almost 3 years ago

reverted in changeset/131586547 for vandalism
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131471158

131513378 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Please note the name tag is not for addresses, that is what the address tags are for. Normally houses do not have a name tag, would you mind removing it? Thanks!

131529769 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. You don't need to add a description tag for everything, the other tags will describe the item well enough. Thanks!

131558194 almost 3 years ago

and also way/8693787

131558194 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

You removed the highway tag from way/8680370, can you please fix that? Thanks!

131556944 almost 3 years ago

No, it's right. That wiki article very clearly says "This page no longer represents a national consensus based on recent discussions on talk-us and the OSMUS Slack. When editing highway classifications in the United States, please consult state-specific documentation." and Michigan has decided to follow the 2021 Highway Classification Guidelines, available here: osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance. The new guidelines prioritize network importance and routing over labels and designations. So, the Old 31 route is a primary highway because it connects several small towns, and I made the business route through Hart a secondary because it's not as important as Old 31, but it is still going through the center of town.

If you're a local and disagree with me downgrading the business route to secondary, I'm fine with you changing it since I don't have local knowledge. But it needs to be a primary based on its importance to the road network, not just because it's a business route.

131357674 almost 3 years ago

No problem, thanks for fixing it!

131446549 almost 3 years ago

I fixed it in changeset/131558471 since it was effecting routing

130655137 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Please note that roof:colour needs to be a hex code with the # preceding it (see roof:colour=*?uselang=en) would you please fix those? Thanks!

131129537 almost 3 years ago

Hi, on this changeset as well, please make sure you're changing the classification of link roads when you change the classification of the roads they link

131129893 almost 3 years ago

Hi, please go through and change all the secondary_link roads to primary_link, thanks!

131350276 almost 3 years ago

reverted in changeset/131557093

131350368 almost 3 years ago

reverted in changeset/131557093

131350099 almost 3 years ago

reverted in changeset/131557093

131350276 almost 3 years ago

Hi, this has been reverted due to you using Google maps, that is unacceptable in OSM. Please see osm.wiki/Google and note that continued use of Google maps will result in you no longer being able to edit OSM.

131277233 almost 3 years ago

Hey, was way/1132025375 a typo?

131063772 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Please fix this bridge, thanks! way/1128711388 it needs to not have a name and natural tag and needs to have a highway and bridge tag.

131239493 almost 3 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions to OSM! service times have strict syntax requirements, see service%20times=*?uselang=en. Would you mind fixing this? thanks!