emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130832167 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Since this isn't a building, adding building:condition won't do anything. The best thing to do is either mark it as access=no or add construction tags. |
| 131244426 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, could you please change the S to South (and fix the typo)? Thanks! |
| 131471158 | almost 3 years ago | reverted in changeset/131586547 for vandalism
|
| 131513378 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Thanks for contributing to OSM! Please note the name tag is not for addresses, that is what the address tags are for. Normally houses do not have a name tag, would you mind removing it? Thanks! |
| 131529769 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Thanks for contributing to OSM. You don't need to add a description tag for everything, the other tags will describe the item well enough. Thanks! |
| 131558194 | almost 3 years ago | and also way/8693787 |
| 131558194 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, You removed the highway tag from way/8680370, can you please fix that? Thanks! |
| 131556944 | almost 3 years ago | No, it's right. That wiki article very clearly says "This page no longer represents a national consensus based on recent discussions on talk-us and the OSMUS Slack. When editing highway classifications in the United States, please consult state-specific documentation." and Michigan has decided to follow the 2021 Highway Classification Guidelines, available here: osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance. The new guidelines prioritize network importance and routing over labels and designations. So, the Old 31 route is a primary highway because it connects several small towns, and I made the business route through Hart a secondary because it's not as important as Old 31, but it is still going through the center of town. If you're a local and disagree with me downgrading the business route to secondary, I'm fine with you changing it since I don't have local knowledge. But it needs to be a primary based on its importance to the road network, not just because it's a business route. |
| 131357674 | almost 3 years ago | No problem, thanks for fixing it! |
| 131446549 | almost 3 years ago | I fixed it in changeset/131558471 since it was effecting routing |
| 130655137 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Please note that roof:colour needs to be a hex code with the # preceding it (see roof:colour=*?uselang=en) would you please fix those? Thanks! |
| 131129537 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, on this changeset as well, please make sure you're changing the classification of link roads when you change the classification of the roads they link |
| 131129893 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, please go through and change all the secondary_link roads to primary_link, thanks! |
| 131350276 | almost 3 years ago | reverted in changeset/131557093 |
| 131350368 | almost 3 years ago | reverted in changeset/131557093 |
| 131350099 | almost 3 years ago | reverted in changeset/131557093 |
| 131350276 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, this has been reverted due to you using Google maps, that is unacceptable in OSM. Please see osm.wiki/Google and note that continued use of Google maps will result in you no longer being able to edit OSM. |
| 131277233 | almost 3 years ago | Hey, was way/1132025375 a typo? |
| 131063772 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Please fix this bridge, thanks! way/1128711388 it needs to not have a name and natural tag and needs to have a highway and bridge tag. |
| 131239493 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Thanks for your contributions to OSM! service times have strict syntax requirements, see service%20times=*?uselang=en. Would you mind fixing this? thanks! |