Hi!

looks like shop=mobile_industrial_equipment was what i was supposed to use there, I've updated it in changeset/175643914

Hi there,

Thanks for the update! A couple of minor fixes: "location" is not meant to be a free-form text value like "Woodland Mall", it has specific values (see location=*?uselang=en). Also, "power" is only for objects that are part of the power grid, it's not for describing how something is powered. You'll want to use the electricity tag for that (electricity=*?uselang=en)

hope this helps!

awesome, thanks for the quick response!

Hi there,

Thanks for the addition. Just to double check, you got explicit permission to use the maps for adding this data, correct? Otherwise it's probably copyrighted and not allowed to be used

Hi there,

You created way/1420288911 and way/1420288909 with no tags, could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!

No worries! I removed it in changeset/169970613#map=17/43.780360/-86.203307

Hi there,

I know this was a while ago, but I'm looking at way/1384371457 west of South Clare Avenue and I can't find any aerial imagery that shows a river there. Like you drew it crossing this driveway way/17759086#map=19/43.929136/-84.768447 but there's no river there, or any infrastructure like a bridge or culvert. and I don't see any continuous stretch of water along US 127 that would be classified as a river

Hello,

On way/57883492 the `maxweight:hgv:conditional` tag is missing a conditional, can you please add that? Thanks!

Hi there,

On way/1159796977, `maxspeed:forward = 2` looks like a typo, could you please fix it? Thanks!

Hey there,

Can you double check way/1118190671, i feel like making that a cycleway was a mistake?

Thanks for the quick response!

Is this a well-established tagging method? It seems to be superfluous tagging, since the crossing is already tagged on another node nearby, what's the benefit of adding a crossing tag to the traffic signals as well?

Hi there,

Over the past few changesets in this area, you've created several ways with no tags. Could you please go back and tag these:

way/1360401813
way/1357823069
way/1357823129#map=19/43.569258/-86.029733
way/1357823204
way/1357823207
way/1357823211
way/1357823201#map=19/43.568649/-86.026818

Thanks!

Hi there,

On way/1360057102 you have lanes=5 but the destination:lanes and destination:ref:lanes only specify 4 lanes. Could you please fix this? Thanks!

Hi there,

Can you please explain what crossing=separate means? It's not detailed on the wiki and it also goes against the meaning of the crossing tag, since it's not also tagged highway=crossing

Hi there,

You created way/1356658405 and way/1356658434 with no tags, can you please go back and tag them? Thanks!

Hi there,

On way/904025597 you added turn:lanes:backward with 3 lanes, but lanes:backward=2. Can you please go back and fix the discrepancy? Thanks!

Hi there,

You tagged several waterways as level=-1 instead of layer=-1 (see level=* "But for typical crossings of roads, waterways or railways via bridges or tunnels, layer=* should be used instead.") Could you please fix these?

Here's the overpass turbo link to find them all https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Y5h

Thanks!

Reverted in changeset/161639162, please do not change relation tags if you do not understand what their purpose is, thanks!

Hi there,

In OSm, we don't add the name to the hole unless it is something more than "Hole 10" (for example at Augusta National where holes have unique names).

I've removed the names from these holes for you, but in the future please refrain from doing this, thanks!

See leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for other incorrect ways of mapping golf features

Hi there,

Thanks for adding all the streams, however, i've removed this one since there's not an actual stream, and the lake is already mapped here: relation/4228055