Hi there,

Usually nodes need more than just a name tag for data consumers to understand what they are. Are these junction names, or trail markers, or something else?

Hi there,

I've removed the address from the dog park area, since it is already on the building: way/1299398391 and there's no need to duplicate it

Hi there,

In OSM, we prefer not to abbreviate things, could you please expand "Tr" to "Trail"?

Also, are the numbers in front of the trail name some sort of reference numbers? If so, they should probably go in the ref tag, not the name tag

Hi there,

For way/753142166/history and way/753142164/history, did you mean to leave the access=no and construction=footway tags on?

Hi there,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1302373651

Could you please fix it?

Hi there,

Did you mean to make this a primary road? Primary roads shouldn't abruptly end like this way/17949015

Hi there,

Are you sure way/1302583774 is a driveway? It looks more like a sidewalk to me

Hi there,

Looks like you may be confused with highway=footway multipolygons. Right now you're using them as if you're mapping a large non-linear routing area. I think you're meaning to map them to show the area of the sidewalk, but that is tagged as "area:highway=footway" (and the sidewalk tag is left out).

Also, you should always still use linear ways for the actual sidewalk, otherwise routers can't use it.

Hi there,

You created way/1301943703 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

Hi there,

Unless the aerial imagery is out of date, I don't think this is a building: way/1298941621/history#map=19/32.71876/-109.72600

Could you find a better tagging for it? Thanks!

Hi there,

I've gone ahead and fixed these already, but for future reference, the tag is "motor_vehicle", not "motorvehicle".

Hi there,

way/1302104044#map=17/33.33604/-111.67522 this road isn't connected to a road at either end, is that intentional?

Hi there,

Did you mean to remove the highway tag from way/16980764/history?

no problem!

Yeah, no, that's not how OSM works. You take responsibility for your mistakes. You created this mechanical edit in clear violation of the guidelines (unless there was a public post that I missed somewhere?), so you either need to revert it or fix all the broken ways you made because of it.

Hi there,

Thanks for the additions! Just a note, tourism=apartment is for a vacation apartment (see tourism=apartment?uselang=en), so that tag doesn't go on regular apartment buildings

Hi there,

You disconnected this driveway when changing the road geometry, could you please reconnect it way/892971332

Oh, sorry, i messed that up. when you prefix note: you only prefix the key, not the value, but i accidentally removed both. I readded it as "note:access". And yeah, "comment" is redundant if you have a note

Hi there,

Did you mean for way/485371964 to go clockwise?

Hi there,

You created way/1288547791 and way/1288547788 with no tags, could you go back and tag them? Thanks!