emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149799985 | over 1 year ago | Sorry for the late response, and thanks for the explanation, it makes more sense now Also yeah, the average in the US currently is about 1 mapper per 5,000 square miles, and outside of major cities it's probably 1 mapper per 8-10k square miles, so there's a lot of places where there's only one mapper, sadly |
| 149935354 | over 1 year ago | I think people are using osm.wiki/Proposal:Tag:footway%3Dlink for that |
| 150076612 | over 1 year ago | Removed in changeset/150122581, point was not located near a street called Anderson Way |
| 150078741 | over 1 year ago | Removed in changeset/150081693, there is only a post office at this location |
| 150067508 | over 1 year ago | Removed in changeset/150081693, there is only a post office at this location |
| 149935354 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, I'm not sure that node/126424942 is a crossing, because it doesn't cross anything. I see there's several like this around the area in recent days, could you maybe explain a bit more about why you think these are crossings? |
| 149967791 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Thanks for the edits! One thing to note, the surface tag should only be one word. I've fixed it for you, but in the future the correct thing to do there is to split the road where it goes from asphalt to dirt, and add the correct surfaces to the two halves. Hope this helps! |
| 149799985 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Roads like way/830222572#map=19/44.26648/-105.45795 don't seem to fit the definition of unclassified, could you explain a bit why you decided to change them all? |
| 149834968 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Did you mean to add the tag "CR 309=no" to way/9861481 and way/9859144#map=16/44.8411/-96.5615? |
| 149846126 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Did you mean to put "intermittent=water" here? way/1271642295 |
| 149795147 | over 1 year ago | Hello, I've removed these roads as they were already existing. In the future, if roads already exist, please edit them instead of drawing new ones, thanks! |
| 149621244 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Could you explain a little more about what way/1270147892 is? Right now nothing can use or render it because there's no tags for it |
| 149582304 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Looks like you might have broken this relation: relation/195213 Could you take a look? Thanks! |
| 149508469 | over 1 year ago | Hello, Please stop adding SEO-type language to the description. That is not what the description tag is meant to be used for |
| 149494509 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Why did you delete this road? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/16940970 |
| 149494892 | over 1 year ago | OSM doesn't have that distinction though, all route relations are expected to be a "customary or regular line of passage or travel" (osm.wiki/Relation:route). |
| 149494892 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Thanks for your edits, however relation/17418394 is not a valid bicycle route relation, since it does not have a defined start and end point |
| 149453511 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, You added "maxweight:hgv:conditional = 82 T", but :conditional tags need to have a conditional restriction (osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions). You're maybe looking for something like one of the examples here: osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Vehicle_dimension |
| 149435183 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, On node/11778264023, you put capacity=250kw, but capacity refers to the number of cars that can use it, not the wattage. Could you please fix that? Thanks! |
| 149376291 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, Looks like this changeset broke way/96843858, would you mind fixing it? Thanks! |