Hi there,

You dragged this node node/8493310753 and glued it to the landuse, breaking this building: way/914281820

Could you please go back and fix it? Thanks!

You also deleted things that were clearly existing, like this pier way/1261324993, and also you re-added a railway across several roads which do not have any signs of railway infrastructure on them

Really? You're seeing it cross roads with no railway crossing like here node/185002244?

railway=abandoned is a "route [that] is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure". Key word here is "infrastructure", which a ROW is not. Bing streetside here way/141080659 shows no evidence of infrastructure, only a two track through the woods.

This changeset has been re-instated in changeset/148681678#map=14/42.8903/-85.3404, even if the argument could be made for some of the railways existing, it cannot be made for all of them, and since the revert also deleted valid objects like way/1261324993, it is unquestionably vandalism, and the DWG has been notified of it

Reverted for vandalism in changeset/148681678#map=14/42.8903/-85.3404 for adding railways that don't exist and deleting valid existing elements. DWG has also been notified given your history with this. Please do not attempt to re-add these railways.

Hi there,

Looks like this changeset disconnected West Avenue K from South 9th Street: node/11727730907#map=18/32.93634/-103.35941

Was that intentional?

This changeset created node/11726182278 on top of the already existing place=village node, might want to check that out

Hi there,

Thanks for the additions! Please see the wiki page for how to properly tag sawmills: industrial=sawmill?uselang=en you need to also add landuse=industrial, and it's best if it's an area, not a point. Would you mind fixing this (and the other ones)? Thanks!

Reverted for vandalism in changeset/148637478

Hi,

thanks for the addition. Houses don't need to have names, could you please remove the name? Also, you seem to have accidentally deleted the highway tag off a road. I've fixed it for you, but be careful in the future to not do that. Thanks!

Hi,

This building is already mapped here: way/82245561

Please remove the building you just made (way/1261949657), and please do not draw over existing buildings, thanks!

i did check the history of the page. That single user is a member of the DWG, so i was inclined to believe it was valid. Also the wiki page for tourism=hotel has had this way of mapping for several years, so it looked like Fizzie was matching that wiki page, which made sense to me.

Also I checked overpass, and found that 16% of tourism=motel ways did not have a building tag, which I thought was a large enough percentage to count as a valid way of mapping.

Also from a pragmatic standpoint, I do stand by my initial comment about a multipolygon being a subpar way to map it (losing the distinction between motel building and motel office, inability to add refining tags like building:levels, building:color, etc). I don't know of another correct way to map this.

Yeah, iD shouldn't do that, it's a valid way to map according to tourism=motel#As_an_area

Hi there,

For relation/17331522, it's much easier and less confusing to draw an area around the motel grounds and add tourism=motel and the rest of the tags to that area, then tag the motel buildings as building=motel. That way it's easier for consumers and other editors to understand it.

Hi there,

did you mean to add node/11717026193#map=19/47.23816/-88.46874 to this relation? relation/17333346#map=16/47.2370/-88.4726

Hi there,

Did you mean to change railway=abandoned to railway=path here? way/1218802913/history

Sure! I don't use JOSM a lot, so this might not be the quickest way to do it, but you can open up the Relations panel, then select all the disc_golf=hole ways and create a new relation with them, adding type=disc_golf_course as a relation tag. Then you can delete the type tag from the ways

Also, tees and baskets shouldn't have names, the hole number should go in the ref tag of the disc_golf=hole way. There's a well-mapped course here to look at as an example: relation/14081231

Finally, make sure you add a node like they did here node/2293235686 tagged as leisure=disc_golf_course to add the name, address, access, fee, etc.

Hope this helps, let me know if you have any more questions!

Hi there,

Thanks for the additions! In OSM, we try to not name roads (and other things) in a "descriptive" way, it's okay to leave it unnamed if it's just a parking aisle. Hope this helps!

Hi there,

thanks for the additions!
type=disc_golf_course is not supposed to go on the holes, see leisure=disc_golf_course for how to correctly tag them. Hope this helps!

Oops, the link is supposed to be node/4564500810#map=19/41.83027/-86.25666 sorry