emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 148272478 | almost 2 years ago | Hey there, Would you mind documenting the "nwsr" key on the wiki so that everyone else understands what it is? Thanks! |
| 148116838 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, On node/4730031807/history, you added the "traffic_signals" tag. I just wanted to make sure since there doesn't seem to be a traffic signal in the aerial imagery, that it's actually a traffic signal. Could you confirm that? Thanks! |
| 148357861 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Did you mean to disconnect these two roads here? node/11701945940#map=19/46.90487/-102.80859 |
| 148305045 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, Thanks for contributing to OSM. Please only name buildings if they are actually named in the real world. Also, please don't create buildings over top of already existing buildings. Thanks! |
| 148284453 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Please don't add `barrier=lift_gate` to show where a railway barrier is. The correct way to do that is using the crossing:barrier=* on the railway crossing node |
| 148185501 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, relation/16706669#map=17/32.14490/-110.97022 is now broken due to the changes you made, could you please fix it? Thanks! |
| 148161729 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, When you're creating roads, make sure to always connect the roads together, otherwise if there's a gap like there is here: node/11687555533#map=19/48.15868/-104.16000 then no software understands that they are connected and the road is basically unusable |
| 148098836 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted for vandalism in changeset/148151376#map=14/33.3043/-104.5178, creating non-existent roads and buildings |
| 148147507 | almost 2 years ago | All major trail applications that use OSM will respect access=no. The person originally adding them is probably one of the many people who maps trails based on Strava heatmaps. I'm not sure what a better option is, unless you want to constantly double check this location to make sure no one else re-adds them |
| 148147507 | almost 2 years ago | okay, so deleting them is not the right thing to do, because someone is just going to come around and add them again. I'll revert this changeset and then add access=no so that everyone understands that the trails are not supposed to be used |
| 148147507 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, Can you please describe why you have called these "bandit trails"? Thanks! |
| 148031645 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted in changeset/148100328 for breaking the map, changing an admin boundary to a bicycle route. Please create a new relation for the bicycle route |
| 147297010 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, There's a few lane related mistakes in this changeset: way/150830542#map=19/42.95409/-85.67176 and way/1246969403#map=19/42.96762/-85.67845 have a mismatch between lanes and destination:lanes way/1246969397#map=19/42.97150/-85.67783 and way/1248838344#map=19/42.95316/-85.67209 have a mismatch between lanes and turn:lanes way/38893693#map=19/42.97328/-85.68253 has a mismatch between lanes and change:lanes Could you please fix these? Thanks! |
| 147269846 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, There's a few lane related mistakes in this changeset: way/38893881#map=19/42.97240/-85.67731 and way/1246969374#map=19/42.97292/-85.68692 have different lane counts in lanes and turn:lanes way/1175923333#map=19/42.97330/-85.68361 has different counts in lanes and change:lanes way/1248279566 has different counts in lanes and destination:lanes Could you please fix these? Thanks! |
| 147377055 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, There's a few lane count mismatches here:
In way/1249579645#map=19/42.92780/-85.68139, the number of lanes in the lanes tag does not match the number of lanes indicated in the change:lanes tag. Could you please fix these? Thanks! |
| 147903349 | almost 2 years ago | Also, you created this relation relation/17267765#map=18/32.22669/-110.97073 which has an unclosed part. Could you also fix this? Thanks! |
| 147915805 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, I've fixed all of these, but in the future, motor vehicle access tagging uses motor_vehicle, not motorvehicle |
| 147903349 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, When you edited relation/1023567#map=15/32.2356/-110.9649, you added this boundary way instead of the road underneath it: way/869767616#map=19/32.22440/-110.96558 Can you please fix this? Thanks! |
| 147147447 | almost 2 years ago | hi there, Just checking in on this, can you please fix it? Thanks! |
| 147584438 | almost 2 years ago | Looks like it's still on node/6086615790/history |