OpenStreetMap
emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 146386503 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Did you mean to add "building=house;yes" on way/1240646036? |
| 146339532 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, On node/9273406399 you have "crossing=unmarked,uncontrolled", but in both Bing and Esri imagery i see markings and the shadows of traffic lights. Could you double check that those tags are correct? Thanks! |
| 146346037 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Could you please explain what these are and why they are different from the already existing Zanjero Trails boundaries like relation/16694534#map=15/33.5226/-112.4656? |
| 146388539 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, This changeset mangled this area: way/907159637 Could you please fix this? Thanks! |
| 146382502 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Thanks for the addition! In the USA, the "name" and "name:en" tags must be equal, could you please fix that? Thanks! |
| 146373382 | almost 2 years ago | Hey there, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! We don't normally name houses, since the house number is already in the addr:housenumber tag. Would you mind removing the name from that house? Thanks! |
| 146293605 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Thanks for the contribution! In the USA, "name" and "name:en" need to be equal, can you please fix this? Thanks! |
| 146288961 | almost 2 years ago | Looks fine to me, the suspicious data was probably something you downloaded in JOSM but didn't edit. |
| 146199796 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Thanks for mapping! When you map crossings, please don't mix them with stops like node/3444504033. Instead, the crossing node should be at the point where pedestrians cross, and the stop node should be at the point where cars stop. Hope this helps! |
| 146253723 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, You created this way with no tags: way/1239680182 Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
| 146257267 | almost 2 years ago | Here's a list of all the duplicate nodes/ways: way/1239718341 / way/1239714300
|
| 146257267 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Looks like this changeset got botched, there's a lot of duplicate areas like way/1239718346 / way/1239714305 way/1239718347 / way/1239714306 and a lot of empty nodes like node/11517360719 and node/11517360718 Would you mind taking a look at this? Thanks! |
| 146002841 | almost 2 years ago | Great, thanks! |
| 146163792 | almost 2 years ago | Looks good, thanks! |
| 146164424 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, I see you're creating a new tag value "american-chinese" for cuisine. Since you are the only one using it, you should document it on the wiki, and it should be "american_chinese" to conform to the conventions for tag values (osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_values) |
| 146223554 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Looks like this changeset mangled way/1190027400, could you please fix that? Thanks! |
| 146205852 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, Why did you add "area=yes" to the wall ways like way/1239341123? |
| 146163792 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, On way/1238996468#map=19/42.72922/-84.46152 you added "turn:lanes", but it's not a oneway road and the lanes are out of order. Could you go back and double check that those tags are entered correctly please? Thanks! |
| 146125221 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, On way/1238740367 you added "turn:lanes", but it's not marked as a oneway road and the lanes appear to be out of order. Could you go back and double check that those tags are entered correctly please? |
| 145250382 | almost 2 years ago | I'm not, but I've been working through a lot of the tagging issues in AZ recently. Could you elaborate more? It's been a few weeks, but I remember that the ones I removed did not meet the criteria for amenity=bus_station because they did not "consist of several bus stops, usually allowing people to travel in many different directions." (amenity=bus_station), they were only 1 or 2 stops on the same route(s). I double checked the wiki pages for AZ, Maricopa, and Phoenix and did not see anything about exemptions to that definition, so I fixed a few of them |