emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137812548 | over 2 years ago | Reverted in changeset/137812733 for potential vandalism: mass deletion of valid objects Please do not delete objects unless they no longer exist on the ground, and please make better changeset comments that reflect what you're doing in the changeset |
| 137686124 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I've removed this from the map, it appears to be a residential house with no signage indicating that it is a business. Because of this, it is not able to be verified, and does not belong on the map. If you think this is in error, please go to changeset/137686124 and add a comment explaining why you disagree. |
| 137407518 | over 2 years ago | And you confirmed that using information from Expedia is allowed under the terms of service of both Expedia and OSM? |
| 137407518 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Can I please know what source you used for the "stars=2.5" tag? |
| 137406162 | over 2 years ago | Hi, The description tag is not meant to be used for SEO purposes, I've removed it, please do not re-add it |
| 137349805 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Are you sure way/1182141921 is a service road? It doesn't seem wide enough for a car, at least from Bing aerials |
| 137278070 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Your recent changesets have created a lot of overlapping buildings (like way/1116349778) and ways with no tags (like way/1181731138). Please go through this neighborhood and fix all of these, thanks! |
| 137221511 | over 2 years ago | Hi, This already existed here: node/5773247036 so I removed the duplicate |
| 137114192 | over 2 years ago | Hi, You accidentally removed highway=trunk from way/611256838/history, effectively deleting it from the map. I fixed it for you, but please be more careful in the future, thanks! |
| 137072337 | over 2 years ago | Hey there, Thanks a lot for updating Marquette! Wanted to clear up a couple confusing things from this changeset so you know what to do in the future. First, with street crossings, there needs to be a line connecting the sidewalk to the street, and the crossing point goes where that line connects with the street, for example like this: osm.org/edit#map=19/46.54315/-87.39289 Also, I reverted the parts of Washington and Front back to primary. One of the important parts of road classification is that there can't be any "spurs" where a higher importance road like a Primary road ends at a lower priority road, it needs to end at the same level or higher. So if you think that Washington and Front are better classified as tertiary, you need to change them all the way to US 41. (I'm not sure they should be tertiary, since it's the main road through the downtown area, they'd most likely be primary or secondary) Hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions! |
| 137063161 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for the additions to the map, however, the description tag is not meant to be used for advertising, see description=*?uselang=en#No_advertising for more information. Would you please remove the description tags from these businesses? Thanks! |
| 137027147 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Thanks for the changeset, when you're adding crossings, you need to make sure they don't overlap with already existing sidewalks or crossings. For example, your crossing here: osm.org/edit?way=1180062325#map=20/42.78568/-86.10439 overlaps with the sidewalk, that's why the dashes are a different color. Could you go back and fix those to make sure that nothing is overlapping? Thanks! |
| 137011768 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Did you mean for this building to have two street names? way/900810576 |
| 136939041 | over 2 years ago | Hi, You created way/1178791935 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
| 136849682 | over 2 years ago | Thanks! Tagging the football field as access=private would be the correct value, access=official is sort of a misnomer and isn't widely used, see access=official for more information |
| 136990372 | over 2 years ago | Never delete other people's work, modify the existing objects instead. See osm.wiki/Keep_the_history for more information. It's considered rude to outright delete an entire golf course and then re-draw it basically the same way, especially since you didn't re-add features like the fairway multipolygons. |
| 136988600 | over 2 years ago | Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in changeset/136990372 |
| 136988799 | over 2 years ago | Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in changeset/136990372 |
| 136955184 | over 2 years ago | Reported for spam |
| 136885113 | over 2 years ago | Hi, You created way/1178452585 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |