OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
136392338 over 2 years ago

Right, but according to that wiki page it should be 10, not 18

136429454 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You created two ways with no tags: way/1175172260 and way/1175172257

Could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!

136392338 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Did you mean for this admin_level to be 18? way/1174905275

136512640 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Did you mean to make this entire way a crossing? way/484207405#map=18/42.28111/-83.51074

136468833 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1175405503

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

136475775 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! In the future, please make sure your changeset comment accurately describes what you changed. There were no sidewalks changed in this changeset

136458509 over 2 years ago

Hi,

I've noticed recently that you appear to misunderstand the "noexit" tag. You can read the wiki here: noexit=*?uselang=en

but basically it's not a tag to indicate a dead-end or no outlet road, it's a tag to indicate that travel does not continue at all past a point or way. So this changeset would be incorrect due to the several driveways coming off of Tyrrell road, the "noexit" should only be on the final node of the road, not the entire way

136421306 over 2 years ago

Hi,

This changeset moved a power pole far away from the correct position, see: osm.org/edit?node=3735079426#map=16/43.9516/-83.9063

Can you please fix it? Thanks!

136311909 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You updated the number of lanes, but did not update the "turn:lanes" tag to only have one value. Can you please do that? Thanks!

136383740 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1174846252

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

136395883 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1174932475

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

136356656 over 2 years ago

and also here: relation/15881376#map=19/43.96570/-103.35020

136356656 over 2 years ago

Hi,

You seem to have broken the Central Pennington boundary by leaving an open part here: relation/15881376#map=17/44.05759/-103.17124

Could you please fix that? Thanks

136052672 over 2 years ago

Please double-check your edits in the future, you made an entire stretch of Washtenaw Avenue unroutable because you forgot to remove the oneway=yes

136103550 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for your edits, however I'm going to be reverting this as there are several errors and inaccuracies with it:

1. You added two motorway_link ways as basically a separate turn lane when there's no physical separation, which is not allowed.
2. There's six different traffic lights, so routers would apply incorrect penalties for stopping
3. The destination, destination:ref, and destination:street values are inconsistent and some of them are wrong.
4. The primary/secondary road switch is now in the wrong place because it doesn't connect to a motorway link.

I don't know exactly what it was like before this change, so it might still need to be fixed, but please double check to make sure that what you're doing is a correct way to map. Thanks!

(reverted in changeset/136120750)

136066883 over 2 years ago

The map clearly states its a private driveway, so if someone cant read the map and is trespassing on your property, then thats something the police need to deal with. OpenStreetMap is meant to be a open map of the whole world, including driveways. I dont care if your driveway is there or not, but eventually someone will re-add it, and if you get into a back and forth edit war with them, youll be the one who is banned for deleting correct data, unfortunately, as its considered a form of vandalism (osm.wiki/Vandalism).
So again, if someone incorrectly thinks that your driveway is public when the map clearly shows it isnt, then thats something law enforcement will need to deal with, thats not really something we can control

136066883 over 2 years ago

Yeah, there's really no point in deleting, someone else will just re-add it eventually. It's marked as private, so apps and consumers understand it isn't for public use.

135985165 over 2 years ago

I agree, but you added a node with the role 'label' to the relation, which is something you can't do with a multipolygon, only with a boundary relation. So i wasn't sure if you meant it to be a boundary because you added a label, or if you accidentally added a label to a multipolygon

135985165 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Did you mean for relation/15842899/history to be a type=boundary instead of a type=multipolygon?

135933115 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Can you please give me your source for marking this as a park and ride? I do not see any signage in street view imagery to show that this is a park and ride lot