dudone's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 53348284 | about 8 years ago | Corrected to "Engine". Thanks Dudley |
| 44525055 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.
|
| 46420842 | over 8 years ago | I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from the A685. I have also noticed the issue about driveways not appearing until after footways but this is really an issue for those rendering maps. I haven't raised it so I have no idea what the opinions are. Most rendering is a compromise and much tends to concentrate on urban areas. I don't however think this is a good reason not to use the best tags we have at the moment. OMSUK is looking to produce a rendering specific to the UK so with luck they will consider this issue when designing it. There are many examples in the UK of shared driveways in rural areas and numerous examples of paths leading from driveways. Old estates get broken up into smaller units so driveway become shared. At this time it seems most suitable to tag these as highway=service and service=driveway. I am hoping to do a walk in this area in June so if I get a chance I will try and check these roads in more detail but based on my survey on the area highway=service and service=driveway is what I would use as a tag at this time.
|
| 47300587 | over 8 years ago | Hi Jan Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added. Regards
|
| 46473607 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Mike No problem with the feedback. I'm afraid I don't know how to find the specific way you mention to look at the history. I think this tag must have already been on the way or I must have accidentally copied it from another way as this isn't a tag/style of tagging I would currently intentionally apply. Regards
|
| 45242536 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Jerry Well spotted. If I'm not sure I will use entrance. I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default. Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this. As you suggest it is a stile and a gate. I have corrected this. Regards Dudley |
| 41130893 | over 9 years ago | Hi Wasn't aware that I had. It is hopefully now deleted. Regards Dudley |
| 40663970 | over 9 years ago | Hi I have now looked at the website!! It seems that there was an order to change this into a bridleway from a "non-classified" highway but this has gone to the planning inspectorate as people have objected and what it classifed as a BOAT. It looks like a decision will be made later this year. I've added a note in addition the changes. Regards Dudley |
| 40663970 | over 9 years ago | Hi I walked along this only this Sunday. I haven't quite got the tagging right as it is a little problematic. I was assuming it would be a BOAT given the motocyles and motorcycle with sidecar! that passed me. However it seems it is an adopted highway. You could therefore argue that this is "unclassified" but it doesn't really fit with this. There is a DCC sign in Brushfield asking "Off Roaders" to respect the residents for example. I tend to try and use the highway tag on the basis of function. i.e. track when it is accessing fields and service when it is a driveway to a farmyard or residential area. I will change the small section that serves the residences in Brushfield to highway=service and the rest to highway=track and put access=yes along with a designation=adopted_highway. If your not happy with this feel free to change. I must admit I've not come across this before in the Peak District.
|
| 22643454 | over 9 years ago | Yes. Corrected. Regard Dudley |
| 33698494 | over 9 years ago | Corrected to entrance. Dudley |
| 29016364 | over 9 years ago | Hi Changed to entrance. I generally use this where the is a passage through a collapsed part of wall or a gap that doesn't look like it was every a gate entrance. Regards Dudley |
| 21427367 | over 9 years ago | Hi Andy Looks like a type so I have changed it to hedge. Regards Dudley |
| 27828993 | over 9 years ago | Hi Auto complete getting the better of me. I have changed it to hedge. Regards Dudley |
| 38866887 | over 9 years ago | Hi
|
| 37554047 | over 9 years ago | Sorry it is rather a big change set so I'm not sure which way. The way named Giddy Edge doesn't seem to have a public footpath designation tag. The way to the North (changeset/21740279) does but I'm not sure this is a public right of way or the way changset 7337922. Unfortunely the pictures I have are a bit blurred. I guess these probably need changing to permitted. Do you want me to do this? |
| 37316778 | almost 10 years ago | Deleted. It was a typo. I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road. It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted. Presumably because it is currently closed. |
| 36174069 | almost 10 years ago | Should now be fixed.
|
| 28737094 | about 10 years ago | Hi I've removed the "odd tag" i.e. B=stepping_stone. This was a typo. Is there anything else? Dudley |
| 31207878 | over 10 years ago | Thanks for letting me know. This was a mistake. I've redrawn it. |