OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
53348284 about 8 years ago

Corrected to "Engine". Thanks

Dudley

44525055 over 8 years ago

Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.
Dudley

46420842 over 8 years ago

I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from the A685. I have also noticed the issue about driveways not appearing until after footways but this is really an issue for those rendering maps. I haven't raised it so I have no idea what the opinions are. Most rendering is a compromise and much tends to concentrate on urban areas. I don't however think this is a good reason not to use the best tags we have at the moment. OMSUK is looking to produce a rendering specific to the UK so with luck they will consider this issue when designing it. There are many examples in the UK of shared driveways in rural areas and numerous examples of paths leading from driveways. Old estates get broken up into smaller units so driveway become shared. At this time it seems most suitable to tag these as highway=service and service=driveway. I am hoping to do a walk in this area in June so if I get a chance I will try and check these roads in more detail but based on my survey on the area highway=service and service=driveway is what I would use as a tag at this time.
Dudley

47300587 over 8 years ago

Hi Jan

Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.

Regards
Dudley

46473607 almost 9 years ago

Hi Mike

No problem with the feedback. I'm afraid I don't know how to find the specific way you mention to look at the history. I think this tag must have already been on the way or I must have accidentally copied it from another way as this isn't a tag/style of tagging I would currently intentionally apply.

Regards
Dudley

45242536 almost 9 years ago

Hi Jerry

Well spotted. If I'm not sure I will use entrance. I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default. Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this. As you suggest it is a stile and a gate. I have corrected this.

Regards

Dudley

41130893 over 9 years ago

Hi

Wasn't aware that I had. It is hopefully now deleted.

Regards

Dudley

40663970 over 9 years ago

Hi

I have now looked at the website!!

It seems that there was an order to change this into a bridleway from a "non-classified" highway but this has gone to the planning inspectorate as people have objected and what it classifed as a BOAT. It looks like a decision will be made later this year.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/528541/fps_u1050_7_86_m_on.pdf

I've added a note in addition the changes.

Regards

Dudley

40663970 over 9 years ago

Hi

I walked along this only this Sunday. I haven't quite got the tagging right as it is a little problematic. I was assuming it would be a BOAT given the motocyles and motorcycle with sidecar! that passed me. However it seems it is an adopted highway. You could therefore argue that this is "unclassified" but it doesn't really fit with this. There is a DCC sign in Brushfield asking "Off Roaders" to respect the residents for example.

I tend to try and use the highway tag on the basis of function. i.e. track when it is accessing fields and service when it is a driveway to a farmyard or residential area. I will change the small section that serves the residences in Brushfield to highway=service and the rest to highway=track and put access=yes along with a designation=adopted_highway. If your not happy with this feel free to change. I must admit I've not come across this before in the Peak District.
Regards
Dudley

22643454 over 9 years ago

Yes. Corrected.

Regard

Dudley

33698494 over 9 years ago

Corrected to entrance.

Dudley

29016364 over 9 years ago

Hi

Changed to entrance. I generally use this where the is a passage through a collapsed part of wall or a gap that doesn't look like it was every a gate entrance.

Regards

Dudley

21427367 over 9 years ago

Hi Andy

Looks like a type so I have changed it to hedge.

Regards

Dudley

27828993 over 9 years ago

Hi

Auto complete getting the better of me. I have changed it to hedge.

Regards

Dudley

38866887 over 9 years ago

Hi
Typo due to caps lock. Now fixed,
Regards
Dudley

37554047 over 9 years ago

Sorry it is rather a big change set so I'm not sure which way. The way named Giddy Edge doesn't seem to have a public footpath designation tag. The way to the North (changeset/21740279) does but I'm not sure this is a public right of way or the way changset 7337922. Unfortunely the pictures I have are a bit blurred. I guess these probably need changing to permitted. Do you want me to do this?

37316778 almost 10 years ago

Deleted. It was a typo. I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road. It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted. Presumably because it is currently closed.

36174069 almost 10 years ago

Should now be fixed.
Dudley

28737094 about 10 years ago

Hi

I've removed the "odd tag" i.e. B=stepping_stone. This was a typo.

Is there anything else?

Dudley

31207878 over 10 years ago

Thanks for letting me know. This was a mistake. I've redrawn it.