dpolovinkin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 146696625 | over 1 year ago | hi! are you completely sure this restaurant stands in the middle of the intersection? why is it there? :)) on Google I see no restaurant nearby with the name like that |
| 98983626 | over 1 year ago | I'm not sure you will see after this years, but please, don't add such huge residential areas (way/905461252/history), which you also made incorrectly, merging points of this area with roads and other places, and obviously this all area isn't all residential. Will delete this area and properly remap it after |
| 149617492 | over 1 year ago | добрый день еще раз, хотел попросить, можете плиз свои изменения карты в будущем все таки не делать без комментария, все таки "(no comment)" это неправильно) в OSM есть правило что всегда должен быть коммент который говорит что вы сделали, а у вас сотни вероятно ченджсетов без комментариев спасибо :) |
| 149078137 | over 1 year ago |
hi! just small mention, it's scooters, there's no word "sqooters" :)) gonna fix |
| 150129144 | over 1 year ago | got it! added those tags back to this POI and another to the north, thanks for mentioning this all :) |
| 92010425 | over 1 year ago | dunno if it will be read, but I wonder why did you put height = 18 to basically all buildings in the districts to the right from Clarke Quay? it is obviously not correct if we look at google map 3d model, many buildings have different heights there... |
| 150129144 | over 1 year ago | hm, so you mean just amenity tag is not shown on the map? > People will not take these control points into account when planning their route in apps also
|
| 150129144 | over 1 year ago | btw, do you know this point is actual or not? node/5334375921 the node of this changeset is there, saw it personally several days ago, but didn't see anything down the road to the north... |
| 150129144 | over 1 year ago | hi! hm, what's the issue? didn't think it will confuse anyone heh, it is a checkpoint, not a police station: "A police station is a place that serves as a primary point of contact for the public, i.e. public-facing police facilities.", this place isn't it, just a checkpoint... :) |
| 80426135 | over 1 year ago | hi, long time passed since this (node/5981798541/history), but just in case there is a separate field for gate number, no need to write it in the name |
| 118847806 | over 1 year ago | yeah I see you made those incorrect names in probably all your changesets... bad... |
| 118848134 | over 1 year ago | hi, 2 years passed, but can't see the reason for having two languages in the main name of those university places, there is functionality to make a separate names in other languages for POI. Will fix, just for future for you to know |
| 142931044 | over 1 year ago | hi, what is this POI? is it really tourist attraction? can't find any info online about it, which is strange, maybe it's just a temple or something else? |
| 122667420 | over 1 year ago | yeahh probably the majority of whole neighborhood is this incorrect AI stuff (although I use it often too) |
| 122667420 | over 1 year ago | hi, a lot of buildings you mapped here using AI are actually two and not one and geometry is often not correct, will remap |
| 149463463 | over 1 year ago | all satellites look straight as it is just field there and there is a house and a street as well... if you have info that there is indeed water area there - have to be a proof of that as this strange water was mapped here 12 years ago. |
| 149463463 | over 1 year ago | hi! I removed the water area, not a stream or waterfall... stream is still on the bottom and I didn't remove it, take a look at satellite and see for yourself, does this look like a place where there is water, even occasionally, or is it just a random field? looks like it is.. and as far as I remember they even had this water mapped over a current street and house which can't be correct |
| 96739488 | almost 2 years ago | this whole area isn't residential, you literally mapped res area over huge fields... will remap, as it is quite incorrect :) |
| 137835649 | almost 2 years ago | btw is is especially bad because it covered a smaller and already existing res ares (some of them are there for years already) - and as buildings are basically not mapped here - it removes the only way to say where people live on the map, as res areas show where groups of buildings are |
| 140307996 | almost 2 years ago | hi again! What exactly are you mapping this cliff way/1180190158 over? In a lot of places there is no cliff at all, I don't understand what you've mapped here. Only in some of places it's following the actual cliff (not a regular terrain which is like a huge part of all this cliff you've added...). I will split this line and at least remove the part which was connected to the incorrect "all over the city" residential area. And will be waiting for the update here |