This changeset moved a man_made=survey_point node that was part of the US-Canada border. I reverted that movement in changeset/44744216 .

(Forgot to mention, that revert was in changeset/44744216: changeset/44744216 )

No response, so I reverted the movement of the survey_point nodes.

Hi, is this actually named "Disgusting Swamp"? If that's not an actual name, or if it doesn't have an actual name, the name should be left empty.

Also, if this is actually a swamp it could be tagged with natural=wetland, wetland=swamp

This changeset moves man_made=survey_point nodes that were imported from official surveys made by the International Boundary Commission.

Did you mean to move these nodes? Did the actual stone markers the nodes represent move?

Looks like a bit of Seminary Street wasn't renamed here. (Why is it so many small segments anyway?)

Hey, just letting you know this change seems to have put some strange names on a few towns. I undid the changes (changeset/43848768), which also undid the hostel that you created here.

I wasn't sure if the hostel was supposed to be there (aerial photography showed a bunch of trees and no nearby buildings that looked like a hostel to me) but if it was, sorry about that and feel free to add it back.

I have reverted this changeset in changeset/43677142. The courthouse was better aligned before, and the building next to the courthouse definitely exists, I went past it yesterday,

Actually I'm seeing that you moved almost every node you touched. Is something wrong with your editor? You should fix it to not move the nodes.

Hey, looks like you accidentally moved a node and messed up some roads with this edit. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43659171

Also, it looks like the change to Stowe is wrong. It looks like there's two wikidata entries that need to be merged, but the one previously linked in osm is the better one.

That's a really cool survey! Can I ask where the list of what you asked about came from? Some of them I wouldn't even know to ask about, and I would have expected a "campus district" or "university district" instead of a UVM-specific neighborhood.

You might want to recheck this edit, it doesn't look correct.

Do you have a source for these neighborhood names (in this and later edits)? Lots of names I haven't heard before. I do see real estate listings with them so I'm not questioning accuracy, but I'm wondering if there's a list somewhere or if it's just local knowledge.

I investigated a bit more. Some of the cleanups you're doing are great, but others (like this one) are not. You really should be discussing these kinds of changes in advance, to avoid removing the work that other people have done. I've posted to the mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-November/074913.html to follow up in a place with a wider variety of opinions.

I don't understand this change. That looks like a residential_link to me. You're doing this all over the world? Did you discuss anywhere first?

This seems like an undiscussed mass edit. Please note that you're supposed to talk about these kinds of things on the imports mailing list first, and many similar edits that aren't discussed get reverted by the DWG.

For everyone else: In all of the cases I checked (5), the change here is changing "denomination=non-denominational" to "denomination=nondenominational" (removal of the hyphen).

highway=bus_guideway says that bus_guideway is for when buses run on a specialized track that steers them automatically. On the Bing imagery this looks more like a normal road. Should it be changed to highway=service access=no bus=yes?

What does "width=-1" (on the way) mean?

There's a lot of features added in this changeset that don't have any information except "area=yes". Did you mean to tag them as buildings?

You changed the name of a bike relation here from "Champlain Bikeway" to "Terry Gordon Recreation Path". Are you sure about that change? I'm not particularly familiar with it, but all the references I can find to a Terry Gordon path are specific to Plattsburgh, whereas this relation is much larger.