OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
66203757 almost 7 years ago

Hi, I noticed that many of your changeset descriptions just contain the word "ok", which is not very descriptive. Would it be possible to use a better description? Even if it's only "added buildings". Thank you and happy mapping :)

66139045 almost 7 years ago

Hi! STATEC has a "Répertoire des entreprises luxembourgeoises" published in CC0, that coupled with looking for information on company websites and using CACLR (also CC0) to match the address onto a building. I plan on doing a Mapillary survey when I'm in the area to update the data, as I'm pretty sure I missed a couple of companies.

61198344 almost 7 years ago

Hi, I noticed that you tagged the Intersport with shop=sportsshop, please try and use established tags when possible, such as shop=sports :) Happy mapping!

63197941 about 7 years ago

Hi! When a building gets destroyed, the best thing is to remove the whole building (nodes and way), not just the tags. By only removing the tags, the old building outline is still stored in the OSM database. Happy mapping!

65350565 about 7 years ago

Hi :) Does this changeset resolve your (older) note [1]?
[1] note/1509757

64498899 about 7 years ago

Bonjour, je viens de modifier la toilette que vous avez ajouté. J’ai remarqué que vous n’avez pas utilisé des « tags » qui sont utilisés dans OSM (comme p.ex. amenity=toilets).
Une ressource utile est https://learnosm.org/fr/beginner/id-editor/#ajouter-des-points , qui contient une courte introduction.
Merci pour la contribution 😊

62425711 about 7 years ago

Vielen Dank! :)

64224895 about 7 years ago

Reverted my changeset. If possible, could you change the node into an area covering the concrete pier?

64224895 about 7 years ago

My bad! I must've missed it. I'll revert my changes. Thanks for pointing it out.

62425711 about 7 years ago

Hallo,
Ich habe bemerkt, dass in diesem Changeset ein sehr langer ungetaggter Weg [1]
hinzugefügt wurde. Was ist die Bedeutung dieses Wegs?
Danke 😊
[1] way/624220515#map=16/32.8234/-16.9603&layers=N

59574104 about 7 years ago

Hi, I noticed that you added the description "fermé = closed" to "Ecu de Beaufort Chez Toni" in Beaufort (node/3571574993). Does this mean the POI is closed forever? Happy mapping :)

63576477 about 7 years ago

Hello, I noticed that you added a node containing the house name and address on top of a building that already had the address tagged. This resulted in duplicate addresses for this building.

I fixed it by moving the name onto the building tags. Thank you for participating in OpenStreetMap :) Happy mapping!

63318964 about 7 years ago

Hallo! Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass Sie beim hinzufügen der Hausnummern Kleinbuchstaben verwenden (z.B. Die Hausnummer „1a“ way/241167047). In Luxemburg schreiben wir die Hausnummern mit Buchstaben immer groß (d.h. „1A“, nicht „1a“)
Viel Dank und viel Spaß beim Mappen :)

62042056 over 7 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I added shop=car_repair to the node you created, that way the shop is correctly rendered. Thank you for participating!

52953828 over 7 years ago

Looks like the tag got copy-pasted when creating new nodes. I found 8 nodes with the same ID in Frisange. (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/B6m).

52953828 over 7 years ago

Hi, I noticed that you added some address nodes that contain "ref:caclr" keys with an ID that is very different from the caclr dataset i compiled recently. For example: node/5168960003 has "ref:caclr"=234097, while the building already has ref:caclr=69446, which is also the ID I have in my version of the caclr dataset. Were you using an old caclr dataset version?

61479179 over 7 years ago

Bergem and Pontpierre*

59590982 over 7 years ago

The operational range is between 10-75 meters according to the spec sheet I found at https://www.vitronic.com/traffic-technology/applications/traffic-enforcement/speed-enforcement/poliscan-speed-fixed.html

59590982 over 7 years ago

Hi, I think it would be better if we left the radars on the actual position, and added the speed enforcement using the relation type osm.wiki/Relation:enforcement
Opinion?

58906482 over 7 years ago

Hi, I noticed that you have mapped a lot of interesting features, unfortunately you used "name:en" to map names in arabic(?). name:en is supposed to be in english. Would it be possible for you to change the tags to the correct localization? Thank you for contributing!