dmgroom_ct's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 44950601 | almost 9 years ago | mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:
b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd highway. c) the 2 highways to be joined have nodes which are in the same position, but are not the same node, so routing is impossible d) rather than joining highway 1 to highway 2, the end of highway 1 is very close to, but not connected to highway 2. these problems are identifiable on the routing layer of OSM Inspector |
| 44922248 | almost 9 years ago | mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:
b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd highway. c) the 2 highways to be joined have nodes which are in the same position, but are not the same node, so routing is impossible d) rather than joining highway 1 to highway 2, the end of highway 1 is very close to, but not connected to highway 2. |
| 40304344 | about 9 years ago | local CAMRA web site says this is now open |
| 41345000 | about 9 years ago | Is this really a bridleway? the road each side of the bridge is marked as tertiary |
| 42164903 | over 9 years ago | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
| 42164847 | over 9 years ago | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
| 42164879 | over 9 years ago | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
| 35901225 | about 10 years ago | source should have been marked as survey |