I have added a tidal flat in front of Puerto Caimito

I do try and remember to update the existing tags on the ways & relations to the new tagging, But I dont always remember to do so.

yes, but you can usually tell if the ground has been disturbed where a building has been removed

I have now updated some of the coastline based on the Maxar imagery see changeset/106164860

Agreed and building way id: 953050430 appears on Maxar but not on Bing

It's not just that is it is high tide, the HW line is approx 160m inland in the Maxar imagery compared to the Bing imagery near node/7302385628. Can you confirm the Maxar imagery is more recent than the Bing?

Yes the Bing imagery is good there

Thats seems OK to me

I have re-tagged the tracks as "highway=service"

Thank you, now corrected

fixed in changeset changeset/96157990

Actually looking at this changeset I cant find any tidal inlets which i removed the coastline tag from. The purpose of the edits was to align the ways with identifiable features from imagery, very little changes were made to tagging.

However I do agree that it is probable that the ways currently marked as coastline are the outer boundary of mangrove areas.

The cliff is included in the realtion. However in my opinion it should not be.

if you have a better suggestion than man_made=breakwater then I'm open to discussion. You can have artifical islands, so I don't see why you can't have artificial islets

Please don't remove the natural=coastline tag from small islands (eg way 13,785,475)

I believe I have fixed this

Where these tidal channels meet the open sea the way had been tagged as natural=coastline, but the edge of the channel was also tagged as natural = coastline. There there was no longer and unbroken continuous set of ways tagged as coastline, and the natural=coastline tag had to be removed from some ways in order to fix the coastline.

I decided to remove the tag from the way marking the estuaries as these ways were already part of a water multipolygon and it is a duplication to have something render as both a water area and a coastline area.

If you wish to continue discussion on this matter please message me rather than leaving comments on this changeset

Where these tidal channels meet the open sea the way had been tagged as natural=coastline, but the edge of the channel was also tagged as natural = coastline. There there was no longer and unbroken continuos set of ways tagged as coastline, and the natural=coastline tag had to be removed from some ways .

If you look at the history of way/6623885638 you will see that you are incorrect in believing that I used the natural=water tag on this way, or any relation which this way way part of.

If you wish to continue discussion on this matter please message me rather than leaving comments on this changeset

This chageset has a number of ways tagged as coastline. I have removed these tags, and the ways are now untagged

Hi
many of the ways you tagged as area = yes are probably buildings and could be tagged as building = yes