OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
96935969 almost 5 years ago

thank you for the discussion on the Italian telegram channel.

96935969 almost 5 years ago

Why did you remove the names from the sidewalks?

95383858 almost 5 years ago

sì, tempo fa alla DWG che ha emesso un 0day block:
osm.org/user_blocks/4647

72084514 about 5 years ago

als Tore existieren sie nur noch als „Echo“/Spuren, im Sinne dass sich die Stadt (Straßen) danach orientiert, aber unter den Tübingern existieren sie als Orte durchaus. „Lass uns am Haagtor treffen“ versteht jeder...

95383235 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95383311 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95383858 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95449496 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95449775 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95450007 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95451196 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95490043 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95491042 about 5 years ago

vandalism

95490784 about 5 years ago

vandalism

94903703 about 5 years ago

come mai tutte queste cose cancellate?

95568258 about 5 years ago

Hi Città di Palmi, can you please explain what you have been doing here? This looks like vandalism, but maybe there is an explanation? Your changeset comment is not helpful either (minor modifications)

84475043 about 5 years ago

It depends on the question how similar one sees “aree toponomastiche” and “zone urbanistiche”, but it clearly is a case where the reference from the wikipedia article to wikidata is not about the same wikidata item that is suitable for the object in OpenStreetMap, while the wikipedia article link is fine. Please refrain from semiautomatic remote mapping if you don’t look closely at the objects, in this case there was even a “different from” relation in wikidata and while the name is similar, the refs are different. Not every wikidata object linked from a wikipedia article is the right object for OpenStreetMap, sometimes there are several things in the same article and you can only have an WP article linked once from wikidata (only 1 wikidata item per article)

84475043 about 5 years ago

Hi Elapsus, I believe there is a problem with this edit, because you added the wikidata reference of the Quartiere toponomastico to this "zona urbanistica". Have a look at name and ref tags and at this relation: relation/5460386 which has the same link to wikidata...

90635333 about 5 years ago

Danke, auch fürs Teilnehmen an der Diskussion im dt. Forum

56143755 about 5 years ago

Changeset genannt in Diskussion um gelöschte Namen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409