this looks like an (semi-) automatic edit , was it discussed before the execution, as the guidelines require?

please be more accurate in positioning the objects, this is not in the middle of the street. FYI, someone else has already corrected it

please also set an operator for post offices and mind the capitalization in names (inizio maiuscolo), thank you

this shop is surely not in the center of the street, please be more accurate

ho messo il fixme, perché non potevo guardare lo storico (al inizio, problema del server, nemmeno in JOSM funzionava ctrl+h), e se tu non avessi risposto avremmo comunque avuto una nota per il prossimo che ci va (non ci sono andato e non sapevo per certo se il mio commento era pertinente).

Per me i fixme sono utili per non perdere di vista i dubbi. Essendo direttamente legati all'oggetto sono molto probabilmente guardati da chi tocca questo oggetto la prossima volta, mentre i changeset comments non hanno questo stretto legame al singolo oggetto.

Per il tag: non esiste, ma lo puoi inventare. Se non lo fai te, mancera anche al prossimo ;-)
Suggerisco la lista tagging.

Is this really a villa_rustica site? From the italian wikipedia article, first sentence, it doesn't seem so: "La villa del Casale è un edificio abitativo tardo antico, popolarmente definito villa nonostante non abbia i caratteri della villa romana extraurbana ..."

in this changeset there are 2 attractions mapped as 2 distinct playgrounds, better use one playground and add 2 attractions, see the wiki for details

il nome "Cisterna circolare cosidetta Piranesi" mi sembra strano. Non sarebbe più adatto farne 2 di name tags, tipo
name=Cisterna circolare e alt_name=Cisterna Piranesi ?

this changeset moves 2 buildings that were aligned well in PCN2008 (better alignment than Bing aerial) and puts them on positions that are very likely less accurate because aligned with Bing Aerial imagery. Please do not re-align based on Bing aerial imagery. I suggest you use them Josm editor, because it can use WMS distributed imagery.

this changeset deletes the way way/353021473
can you explain why?

danke für den Link, das war mir in dem Thread entgangen, dass die Lösung gefunden wurde (ist gleich wie auch in anderen multilingualen Gegenden, z.B. Belgien, Südtirol)

Es gilt im Zweifel die vor-Ort-Regel: das, was gebräuchlich ist, kommt in den name-tag. Die gesetzliche Lage sollte man nicht komplett ignorieren, es hat schon seinen Grund, warum dort neben deutsch auch sorbisch Amtssprache ist und die Beschilderung auch in sorbisch erfolgt.

There is an entrance from the road, I confirm it is a terrace, but I'm not sure about the "roof" (thought it was a pergola). It is no problem if some building types are not yet in heavy use, the only way to make them more established is by using them. When I introduced building=roof by writing a definition in the wiki there also have been only 5 of them ;-) Please do never combine polygons and linear ways on the same object (e.g. building=roof and barrier=wall), as this cannot be interpreted without guessing.

this changeset added building=yes tag for the marani bar terrace, is this on purpose? Do you know the situation "in loco"? Seems wrong to me in this case.

sorry, forget about that comment, it was a temporary rendering problem...

are there really 2 cafes with different names at the same spot?

this hotel is exactly in the gap between buildings, is this correct? Seems very odd to me...

this added a fast food in the middle of the road, is this correct?

I have changed it now...

the name says bed&breakfast but you have added it as hotel?