This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.

this is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit it seems.

Hi keimo, is this possibly an undiscussed automated or mechanical edit? It seems you replaced addr:staircase with addr:unit, but these are likely describing different situations, and I believe here (5 building levels) it is much more likely that addr:staircase applies rather than addr:unit.

Ciao AlCe,
ho notato che hai cambiato il tag dell'edificio centro convegni da building=convention in building=service, non mi sembra un miglioramento. building=service viene utilizzato per edifici poco significativi, solitamente piccoli. Sono ritornato con la classificazione,
building=service?uselang=en

un saluto
Martin

danke fürs taggen des loc_name! Ich habe gerade zufällig den Bahnhof angesehen. Was hieltest du von loc_name=Zoo und short_name=Bahnhof Zoo? Das eröffnete natürlich Verwechslungspotenzial mit dem Zoo-Zoo, aber im Alltagsgebrauch ist das ja auch so.

I am not sure we should. I have not been inside, just seen the outside, it seemed to have just pet food and other articles, but no pets (like fish or birds, or mice, or similar animals). I did not check the wiki and this is not something I am mapping very often. Feel free to retag.

Salve, ho notato che hai migliorato la precisione di questa rotonda: way/408549194/history da 24 nodi a 511 nodi. È stato un’azione volontaria o forse una svista oppure un problema di software?

Il commento era in riferimento a way/1204857010/ (l'ho adesso sistemato e gli altri in questo changeset erano già stati corretti da altri, come ho visto ora)

Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito dei cavi 150kV, sotto terra, penso il tag dovrebbe essere power=cable, e non power=line, perchè si tratta di cavi isolati:
osm.wiki/Tag%3Apower%3Dcable

Ciao,
dieterdreist

Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito questo service, ma mi sembra strano. Forse è privato e c’è un cancello?
way/562591941
Saluti

ich denke ebenfalls, dass der Sinn von motorroad=yes genau der ist, foot=no bicycle=no horse=no und moped=no (etc) zu implizieren, ansonsten ist es einfach highway=trunk ohne motorrad und man setzt ggf. den access für die diversen Bewegungsarten einzeln

Hi, irgendwie sind hier bei Hornbach eine Menge Informationen verloren gegangen, z.B. Filialnummer, Telefonnummer, Steuernummer etc.
Vielleicht auf ein größeres Polygon migriert vom Gebäude? Das kann ich gerade nicht prüfen, in der aktuellen Version waren ein paar tags wieder da und ein paar fehlten aber (die Ursache könnte in anderen Edits liegen)
Gruß Martin

dir auch Danke für die Diskussion

Klar, jeder kann nur das eintragen was er will, aber natürlich nicht löschen was er will. OpenStreetMap ist ja kein Kartenprogramm sondern eine Datenbank, je mehr die wächst um so weniger wird man beim Benutzen alles haben wollen, sondern eben einen Extrakt der Dinge die einem wichtig sind. Wer Stadtansichten in 3D rendert, der freut sich sicher über einzelne Bäume, erst recht wenn sie Zusatzinformationen haben