Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor.
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset.
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: changeset/54264694

Hoi AceT,

Bedankt voor je oplettendheid. Momenteel ben ik bezig met het updaten van panden uit de bag. Ik ga hierbij er vanuit dat de bag correct is, tenzij ik uit osm hints krijg dat er iets anders aan de hand is. (
Maar uiteraard is eigen waarneming betrouwbaarder.

Ik kan helaas niet vinden welk gebouw je bedoelt. Kan je een link naar dit pand geven?

Als je meer van degelijke situatie tegenkomt kan je twee dingen doen:
1. Zet de tag "note" of "note:BAG" met daarin de opmerking dat, wat en/of waarom je een pand of adres afwijkend van de bag hebt aangepast.
2. Doe een terugmelding. check op https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/ of het probleem ook daar voorkomt en laat daar je terugmelding achter.

Bedankt voor het melden, ik heb het opgelost.
Ik heb op het forum al eens aangegeven dat deze fout makkelijk te maken is zie: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59923
In dat topic stel ik voor een validator check te toe te voegen voor ODS tags. Is dit haalbaar?

Don't know exactly. But I can think of a few use cases. Outlines like this are are very common around the world at places were you can't expect hires imagery everywhere.
Also note that I didn't add them, I just improved the geometry of them.

Happy mapping!

Ik heb een paar turn restrictions toegevoegd. Nu zou het moeten kloppen

Beste seat, zou je alsjeblieft de moeite kunnen nemen om te reageren.

Bedankt voor het opmerken en fixen!
Het was eigenlijk al als turbo rotonde ingetekend, maar dan met een paar fouten er in. Normaal gesproken check ik in dergelijke gevallen alle betrokken relaties, maar waarschijnlijk was ik afgeleid door iets anders dat ik 'moest' corrigeren. Net zoals deze rotonde mij afleidde van de bag update waar ik eigenlijk mee bezig was.
Nogmaals bedank en excuses voor het ongemak.