Sorry wegen des changeset Kommentars. Musste mal dieses fragwuerdige feature von osmcha ausprobieren.

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55413338

I agree, if you are editing those entries anyway, it would have been nice to do the extra work and check the website if it supports https as well.

Also, this looks like a mechanical edit to me. Asking beforehand, for example on talk-ch, would be the common courtesy.

Ja das finde ich gut.

Hallo Grillmaster935. Du hast das Casion Parkhaus mit fee=no ergänzt. Aber das Casino Parkhaus kostet etwas, da bin ich mir ziemlich sicher. Grüsse, und viel Spass beim mappen. Michael

Ich finde das ist nicht ganz der Richtige Ort um das zu besprechen. Ich würde da eher die Schweizer Mailingliste vorschlagen.
dikkeknodel hat recht, eine Wanderroute muss keinen namen haben. der name= tag ist für eigennamen gedacht (Wie das Beispiel Rigi Lehenweg). Mir gefällt das nicht alle routen relationen mit "von - bis" namen auszustatten. Bitte nich systematisch allen routen einen solchen Namen hinzufügen.

Hallo hecktor.
Auf https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ werden alle angezeigt. Ich finde die note noch gut als Mapper, zum wissen von wo bis wo die relation geht. Ob ich eventuell aufsplitten muss.
Grüsse
Michael

Hi
Welcome to OSM. Most of it looks good. But you are overusing leisure=park. You should be especially careful with objects which are already tagged.
Brüggli is a beach, not a park. The lawn near Aabachstrasse/Chamerstrasse is just that, a lawn, sometimes used for sports. And a space on the school ground is also no park. Maybe a playground.
Michael

What an arrogance of you, Jonathan. English may very well be used as a means of communication on OpenStreetMap.

Der node gehört schon in den Gebäudeumriss. Versuch das nächste mal zuerst ctrl-F5 und etwas warten. Das war nur ein lag beim rendern. Der ist schon sichtbar.
Grüsse
Michael

Hi
removing the amenity=library tag makes this node not understandable. Now it looks like an address, but with contact details and a name. There should be a primary tag on this node which makes clear what thing this point refers to.
Michael

schön, ich hab noch die zugehörige note geschlossen. Danke.

Sure. My comment was specific for the situation at node/339958083 where the merging of separated traffic coincides with an intersection, where a u-turn could be taken.
And that is a really bad route from graphhopper. They should improve their routing weights.

You added even more details. Thanks :)

You are right about the split ways. I'm sorry, I misremembered that situation.
True it is an awkward turn, but it is not prohibited, so I would not map it.
As for not good enough, rest assured you are good. Sorry that I cam across as harsh, I was merely puzzled, and my apologies especially because you were right about the shuffling of the lanes indeed. I hope this incident will not deter you in contributing, and I hope to see more of your fine edits.

Why did you shuffle the lanes to different ways on the bridge? Why split up the trunk south of the roundabout?

There is no turn restriction. See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Mxyk_ORixW4OX7iRxppetQ

I don't see anything indicating a highway tag for a summer_toboggan. I think you misunderstood something. If it uses rails, you can add railway=narrow_gauge. Otherwise leisure=track only.

reverted as requested in changeset changeset/52920980

Hallo, Willkommen bei OSM. Was meinst du mit nicht eindeutig? Die Bank ist Innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses mit Hausnummer 2. Das ist ausreichend.

No problem. You did good edits. Hope to see more edits from you, there is still lots to do in Zug. Happy mapping.