All available satellite imagery shows this area as agricultural fields, no buildings. Please find someone to help train you on image interpretation and work to improve your feature identification.

why did you add numbers to these buildings in the "name" field?
proper use of "name" is described here: name=*

please be sure to trace individual buildings outlines, and not large blobs.

Hi Ria Grijaldo, it looks like are using the "name" attribute to track the number of buildings you edit. Please DO NOT do that. Proper use of the "name" attribute is described here: name=*

You can see your OSM contributions by typing in your username on https://hdyc.neis-one.org/

please DO NOT track your edits using the "name" attribute on traced features. proper use of the "name" attribute is described here: name=*

you can see your OSM contributions by typing in your username on https://hdyc.neis-one.org/

I've moved the hospital back since the original mapper notes the following in their profile that they are a local mapper with local knowledge.
@yustian

Please be careful in your future edits to not accidentally change existing data to be incorrect.

Hello, in this changeset you moved a hospital.
node/1570532206

Looking at the satellite imagery, the previous location looks like a large complex of buildings that could very well be a health facility. The new location, not so much.

Did you intend to move the hospital location?

The `name` tag is only used for something like "Empire State Building" or "The Pantheon" and not for tagging what the feature is. `building=yes` is enough. You should not put `name=house` or some such.

The `name` tag is only used for something like "Empire State Building" or "The Pantheon" and not for tagging what the feature is. `building=yes` is enough. You should not put `name=house` or some such.

please follow task instructions and checkout learnosm.org

this is incorrect mapping and tagging.

No problem. Thanks for the quick response. I went and pulled building footprints for Dunbar HS from DC GIS and updated the whole block based on that and local knowledge.

What prompted you to edit in this area? Did you add these features based only on Bing imagery? The imagery is outdated and these features no longer exist. O Street NW does in fact go all the way through between 1st and New Jersey. See on Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YEUh7NiMkphTHDJOZEEq6g