OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
116251821 almost 4 years ago

ok, maybe it shouldn't be access=private but access=destination. also, before the new roundabout on tirino/acquatorbida intersection i mapped some addresses in the zone and i can absolutely confirm to you this way belongs to via tirino. it doesn't mean since the road is now connected to another road it changes its name. it all depends by the numeration. the "strada vicinale acquatorbida" sign refers to the road known as "via vicenza" in san giovanni teatino.

116251351 almost 4 years ago

also fixed outdoor seating (added info about operator and access in wheelchair)

89960971 almost 4 years ago

I did it for rendering purposes, other split bridges are tagged this way... I'll fix it when I can

115993405 almost 4 years ago

The warning on this set is because footwalks aren't connected to other ways, I already know that. Also thank you for the phone_1 key, I didn't know it must be avoided, I'll keep in mind it for future edits

110008236 about 4 years ago

Ciao IlBano, ho sistemato come da tua segnalazione. Grazie

110008236 about 4 years ago

Controllerò quanto prima di persona, se riesco anche domani

112066213 over 4 years ago

Ciao Francesco, per la fermata dell'autobus non ho fatto altro che effettuare la modifica consigliata da iD. Mi scuso se è sbagliata, ma pensavo fosse corretta.

109889898 over 4 years ago

It's funny that you think you can make fun of me... If I call it "edit", "improvement" or "fix" there's no difference, since anyway I am adding details to the map.

Also, I don't know why my errors are skyrocketing, since in this period my only edits were fixes to turning limitations and to roundabouts' roundness for graphic render. My ignored warnings are most of the time tags wrong for amenities that appear in my screen while I'm editing other nodes/ways (which I don't bother to fix, since I don't want to). I wonder too about those 822 reversals.

106642677 over 4 years ago

My congrats for this so precise tagging for this new McD, you really did a great job

101261635 almost 5 years ago

Earlier today I've sent an email to Chieti's municipal administration asking for an official map of SS81 inside the territory of Chieti, when they'll send it to me I'll fix every wrong tagged way to make sure everything is tagged correctly.

101261635 almost 5 years ago

Link for the zoom in https://imgur.com/a/qdFsABX

101261635 almost 5 years ago

Yes

101261635 almost 5 years ago

This is what I see https://imgur.com/a/W8khRHC

101261635 almost 5 years ago

I can actually see the route.

101503248 almost 5 years ago

Is there an area for the outline tagged as building=*? Yes
Are there different parts of the building tagged as building:part=*? Yes
Is there a building relation that groups every way which forms the building? Yes

The wiki's guidelines are fulfilled. That's it. If you want to make other edits, you're welcome.

101503248 almost 5 years ago

Also, let me point out that the building:part=yes tag in the San Giustino cathedral is there since 2015 and you've noticed only now, after a my changeset. Your edit was the last and you didn't notice.
Never tell me again "again you don't read the wiki" or "dumb edits". Thank you and shut up. Next time you'll make a changeset, be sure that you're doing everything correctly. Again, thank you.

101503248 almost 5 years ago

As you can see, I haven't touched these ways (way/137471020 and way/137471000) which still have your changeset as last edit.

101261635 almost 5 years ago

Are you sure? osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=42.1955%2C14.2197%3B42.4582%2C13.9273#map=11/42.3268/14.0742

101261635 almost 5 years ago

What do you mean with this comment

101503248 almost 5 years ago

My edits follow the wiki.
I used the building:part=* tag on certain part of the buildings, not the whole building, so I think I've done everything correctly.