Hallo FrankBe,
danke fürs eintragen der Lade-Stellen!
Sind es wirklich 11 Plätze bei 5 Säulen? Oder doch 2 Stecker pro Säule, also 10 Plätze?
Weißt du, wer der Betreiber ist?

J'ai supprimé votres entrées de test à "null island" et donné un building=yes aux bâtiments à Ampasamanatongotra.
changeset/117888780
changeset/117889177

Bonjour Aritia,

et bienvenue chez OpenStreetMap!
Vous avez choisi "review requested", c'est pourquoi je vous écris.
Pour inscrire un bâtiment, il faut taguer "building=yes" en plus de la silhouette, à voir: osm.wiki/FR:B%C3%A2timents
Si vous avez des questions, la communauté francophone est toujours prête à vous aider !
https://www.openstreetmap.fr
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr

Hello Nourhane,
I deleted the "Regard 4" point node/9525605477 because it showed up at "Null Island". It was probably a software glitch. You should try to add this suction point again at the right location.

Hi Ducs4,
das hört sich ja interessant an, was ist das genau?

Hi Hayden,
now you state source=web searches;gps
Can you give an example of a web search that shows this city exists outside of Google Maps? I haven't found a mention of it anywhere (which does not mean anything of course).

Hi Hayden,
sorry, but we can not use Google Maps (or most other existing maps) as a source for anything, because of copyright / legal issues. Also Google aerial images and Streetview are a complete no-go. Google has money and lawyers... they could really harm OSM if we break their copyright.
See
osm.wiki/Google
osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
So I will remove this entry now.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116733389

Thank you! :-)

Hi, I fixed the NL consulate-general that you accidently turned into a building: way/596634617

Also, according to the website https://www.netherlandsworldwide.nl/countries/nigeria/about-us/embassy-office-in-lagos this is a consulate general and not a "branch_embassy" - whatever the difference may be...

huh? osmcha, what happened here???

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

Hi Hayden,
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place".
Also, what about this tiny bit: way/1025105477
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584

OK, sorry, I see you moved the tagging from the way to a relation. All's well ;-)

Hi Hayden,
why did you remove all the tags again? Now it's just an empty way. Or has the community not yet decided how to tag such "neighborhoods"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116233913

Hi Hayden, is this not actively used as a church any more? Then maybe consider to tag "disused:amenity=place_of_worship" to make it clear.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116082531

Please don't add personal information like "Ownder". It's hard to verify on the ground.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115991582