Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good. It would be good to confirm if the part of the old runway still in the airport area is now a taxiway.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me, you seem to have added lots of appropriate detail.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
The tags you've used are good, but that width looks very specific, is it really precisely that (to the mm) all the way along? Otherwise just make it more approximate, e.g. 1.4 or 1.5

You requested a review of this too and it all looks good to me.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, you requested a review of this change. It looks good to me.
As that's the correct name, you should change the street address on the other houses that are mapped here too.
Happy mapping

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Mostly looks good to me, it's good to have things like this mapped.
Couple of things, first where the crossings are, you've put the traffic lights in just as traffic lights, but they should also be tagged as crossings: highway=traffic%20signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians

Also, your path just ends
way/908670956/
It looks like it should connect with the cycleway that's there already.

Hi, you requested a review of this. The fence you've added crosses runways at the moment. If they are no longer in use then they need to be changed to something like disused:aeroway=runway.
And is it a construction area to the north west of the fence now? In which case the outline of the airport needs updating (you could split the area if that's the case).

Again with the phone number, but again lots of detail and everything else looks good.

Same comment about the phone number, but other than that all looks good, lots of detail.

Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me, you've added lots of detail to it.
Slight thing, phone numbers should be entered in international format (+44 121..., not 0121).
I've fixed them here for you.

Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me

Hi, you requested a review of this change. The tags you've added look good (I've reformatted the phone number and added https to the web address though).
Where you've placed the restaurant is inside the building marked as Prezzo. Is that no longer there, or is the location you've put the marker not quite right?

This looks good too. There seems to be a slight mix of alignments there, but you've matched the buildings which makes sense.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this and there was something odd going on with an extra path in there which I've now removed, but your change looks good.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, you requested a review of this change.
Thanks for adding these buildings, always good to have more mapped.
You had a couple which overlapped slightly. It's best in that case to grab the point and join it on to the building next to it (if it's connected in real life).
Also, make sure you always square the corners, where appropriate.
The other thing is that on a few of those buildings, "house" probably isn't the best type, maybe they are apartment buildings?
Happy mapping!

Hi, you requested a review of this, and it looks good to me.

I think that tag's probably ok then