Hi, you requested a review of this change. Looks good, except that you had the same details on the area and a point, so I've removed the details from the point for you.

Similar comments to the other one, but this looks good too.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
Some would also add location=roof
generator:source=solar
Also I'm not quite sure about the units. The wiki has kW listed as a suitable units, but I think that with solar kWp (peak) is probably suitable.
generator:output=*

Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Thanks for adding this, it's important to have even little paths like this mapped to show the connections.
When you added the path, you connected it to the residential area, it's best practice not to do that, so I've disconnected them here for you.

Hi, you requested a review of this, and it looks good to me, although your description does not seem to match what you actually did.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
If it's a cul-de-sac then perhaps it would be better tagged as a residential road, rather than a service road? Depends on its use though.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looked good, so not quite sure why you've then deleted it?

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this, and it all looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this change. The path you've added looks good, so thanks for doing that.
In this changeset you also made a change to the core paths relation, changing it from hiking to foot. Just wondering why that was?

Hi, you requested a review of this and it all looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Thanks for adding these, it's always good to have more buildings mapped.
Just a note, it's good to always square the corners where appropriate (right click, square), even for buildings that aren't rectangles. I've been in and neatened these up for you here.
Then it would be great to add addresses to any of these houses that you know.

Hi, you requested a review of this.
First, it would be easier to review if you had given even just a brief description of what you'd updated.

This bridge over the railiway you've tagged as steps all the way.
way/907770037/
I imagine that it isn't actually steps in the middle, so you should split it (add a point if needed, then right click and split) and change the type of the appropriate bits (and make sure the direction of the steps is correct after that). Also on the right hand side you've connected it to the building. Aerial imagery makes it look like it's just to the west of the building, in which case it should be disconnected and shown as separate.

I see that you've changed the station from being mapped as a point to being the building. It's good to have a station mapped as an area, but in this case the area should cover the whole of the station area, as it isn't just that building that's the station. See here:
public_transport=station#Usage

You've added a couple of islands:
e.g. way/907770032/
but you've tagged it as a traffic calming feature, which would be meant for a section of road.
I'm not quite sure what tag would best represent those things, maybe try searching the wiki. More useful perhaps would be to tag the crossings there and add detail to them: highway=crossing

That ended up being quite long, but lots of the changes in here were good and useful, so thanks for adding them and happy mapping!

This looks good

Hi, thanks for this.
Just a note on access, if general access is set as private then that implies the same value for all other modes of transport, they don't need to be set explicitly unless they are different to general.

Hi, noexit is for when it's not possible to continue by any mode of transport (see the wiki: noexit=* )
So in these places it does not seem to be suitable, as they are connecting to another road or a path.
node/8374458631/
node/7015660271/
node/8370771512/
If it isn't possible to get between those places then a barrier of some description should be tagged instead.

Mostly good, you had the roads connected to the grass though so I've disconnected that for you

Hi, you requested a review of this edit. It looks good to me. If the construction area is bigger than just where the building is then you could add an area for that.

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
I was going to ask why you deleted the service road, but you've since put it back, so this all looks good to me.