Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Is the southern section of Colebrooke Lane private for cars too? You've only set it as private for pedestrians at the moment.

Hi, you requested a review of this edit and my only comment would be that setting the general access to private (access=private) implies that same access for all types of transport, so there's no need to set motor_vehicle and foot to private as well.

Hi, you requested a review of this edit. It looks like you've added lots of detail to Daisy Grey, which is great.
Just wondering if The Fox is permanently closed? In which case it might be worth changing the tag to "disused:amenity"="pub", rather than "amenity"="pub"

Hi, you requested a review of this edit and I'm happy to say it all looks good.
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy mapping!

Hi, you requested a review of this edit and I'm happy to say that it all looks good to me!
Happy mapping!

Hi, you requested a review of this edit. I'm not quite sure why you've moved the edge of the residential area here. I'm not local to the area, but from aerial imagery, it seems that it had been in the correct place.

Looks good, there was a tag "FIXME:nsl" where the previous mapper had said "inferred single-carriageway NSL - remove this tag once verified"
So I've now removed that.
Also, there are a couple of bits in Warmington where you haven't changed the speed limit. Are they still 60, or did you just miss them? (Easily done)
The sections in particular are:
way/103721364
way/355287213
way/355287219

Hi, did you request review because you were hoping for someone local to confirm that this is in current use?
If so, probably best to leave a note instead as that can more easily be spotted later

Looks good, it looks like you have all of the important information tagged on the house.
Is it really that shape though?
If it's actually rectangular then you can right click and square the corners.
Also if you know the area it would be great to add addresses nearby too. Either tagged on the buildings or as new points.

Hi and thanks for adding this.
Couple of things, first I initially got access denied on the image, but it now seems to be working (may have been my end?)
Also, your description is a bit long. You've linked to your website, which has those details and more.
The wiki: description=*
suggests keeping the description to a few words or maybe a couple of sentences.
Also, it's worded a bit like an advert, which OSM isn't the place for.

Looks good to me

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap
Just checking whether you've surveyed this yourself (it looks like it as it seems you used a gpx file) or whether it was copied from OS Maps, just because your comment isn't quite clear about that.
Also on the southern one of the paths you've added, there's a section where you've put it along the field boundary, which makes it seem like it's going through a hedge! I assume it actually goes one side or the other, so it would be great if you were able to fix that. Or let me know and I should be able to fix it.

Looks good, I've updated the type to a bar (amenity=bar)

Hi, same comment as your other one, the tag is on the point, not the building here. I've changed this too (if something really has no name then you can tag noname=yes).
Again, if there is something new here then please tag that instead.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for adding this info, up to date information on shops is always good to have.
In this case, Monsoon had been tagged on a node (point), rather than on the building outline.
I've removed the name you've added to the building and instead removed the name from the Monsoon point, and changed the shop type to "vacant". If there is a new shop there now then please add that instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98985017

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding this. It's best to keep things separate though. Since this postbox isn't in the middle of the road (I assume), can you make a new node, not connected to the road, and tag the postbox on there?

Thanks for pointing that out, not sure how it could have happened as I thought I always split the ways when editing.
I believe I've fixed it all in changeset #98924390

This, or possibly other edits of yours here recently seem to have affected this: relation/2255290
As I don't know the area very well, can you fix it?

What do you mean by all the shelters you've added? Should the buildings they are in be tagged as houses?

I hadn't thought I'd added +44 to any 08 numbers, can you show me where I did?