Hi, great that you're keeping Springfields up to date.
I see that you only added a partial phone number to Craghoppers Outlet here, "01775".
Do you have the full number for it?
Mapped here: node/11160801371

Comments from other people suggest that it happens when the element has been deleted since the report ran. I will add checks for this so that it doesn't give errors (or make edits) in such cases in future.

Great, that's helpful to know. I will add better checks against this so it shouldn't happen in future.

Ok, thank you. If you get the error again, it would be great if you could let me know so I can try to fix it

Hello, I am trying to understand how you managed to create empty changesets using the phone report tool that I created.
It seems that you created 4 empty changesets (this, 174618440, 174618484, 174618494) for this area before successfully creating changeset/174618556 with 20 edits.
If you can remember what you were doing to make that happen please let me know.

Hello, it looks like you are doing a good job fixing up phone numbers!
I just want to understand if there is something wrong with my tool, as it seems that you created 5 empty changesets (this, 174591805, 174593564, 174594824, 174600104) for województwo mazowieckie before creating changeset/174600765 with 1111 edits in it.
If you can remember what you were doing to make that happen then please let me know

Hi

Sure, I should have added the area I was doing it for, I'll make sure I do that in future.

Hi, thanks for adding this. It looks like you might have missed a digit on the phone number though. Can you double check and fix it? Thanks

I can't use Google Maps as a source, obviously, but if you have surveyed then feel free to correct it. Some of the locations of schools were not perfect in the source data

Hi, it looks like you're doing a great job updating the area around here.

Just a quick note about phone numbers though, for compatibility, it's recommended to use international format, so replace the leading 0 with +44

See phone=* for more on this

I've fixed any I've found, including these recent ones here: changeset/172926617

Hi, it looks like you're doing a great job updating the area around here.
Just a quick note about phone numbers though, for compatibility, it's recommended to use international format, so replace the leading 0 with +44
See phone=* for more on this
I've fixed any I've found, including these recent ones here: changeset/172595217

Hi, it looks like you're doing a great job updating the area around here.
Just a quick note about phone numbers though, for compatibility, it's recommended to use international format, so replace the leading 0 with +44
See phone=* for more on this
I've fixed any I've found, including these recent ones here: changeset/172566425

I've fixed them here
changeset/172470112

Ah yes thanks for pointing that out. I thought I'd done something about that, it's definitely fixed in processing now and I've fixed all schools in the trust here: changeset/172345442

Hi, I know this is old but I'm looking at phone numbers, and there are a few round here that you've mapped with invalid numbers. It seems to be the same thing, where it's got two area codes, such as +44 131 1875 820350. Any idea what the correct number should be? Or maybe all such numbers should be removed and resurveyed?
e.g.
way/1075570746 and node/2737511318

Hi, thanks for adding and confirming these.
I was just looking at phone numbers and it seems you missed the area code (141) off some of the phone numbers here, for example: node/12140956381
I've fixed that and at least one other

Ah no, that check date was based off the update date of the official data. I meant to check if it was changing anything it shouldn't have done, I'll watch out for that in future.

I've reverted the check_date to what it was before

Hi, I don't recall the reason for the change of access. It could well have been a temporary closure, so feel free to revert it to being open

That appears to be an oversight on my part, maybe the interface wasn't clear enough about which Lincoln was being referred to. Maybe best to just remove it

You seem to have covered a huge area here.
I note way/1132974077 which I would definitely not describe as a track, having travelled on it myself.
Can I ask what led to these edits? As they do not seem to reflect how the highway tag is used for tracks and minor roads.