OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
121465582 over 3 years ago

Thanks for this, and others but watch out for the syntax of collection times, e.g. it should be "Mo-Fr 09:00; Sa 07:00"
Happy mapping

110934054 over 3 years ago

Feel free to dive in and have a go at correcting them. Or let me know which ones specifically you mean and I'll see if I can have a go

109478972 over 3 years ago

I don't think so, it looks like I was cleaning up after that was introduced in changeset/105998331

118965674 over 3 years ago

The difference is really between "terrace" and "terraced".
Until recently, there hadn't been anything specific to distinguish individual terraced houses, but then the house= subspace started being used. You could just map them as a house and be done with it, or add house=terraced to be more specific

120639352 over 3 years ago

Comment should read "Add data to schools in the UK using Get Information About Schools open data"

114040921 over 3 years ago

Hi, I appreciate it was a few months ago but I see you changed the UPRN on Bexhill High Academy
way/399268818/history

The UPRN I had added is the UPRN of the school and I assume the one you added is that of the building.

Is there any way to split the school from the building? i.e. do the two schools fully share that site or is there any way they can be mapped as separate areas, apart from their buildings?

113077088 over 3 years ago

Yes, good point. I've put appropriate information on all three objects now

119683028 over 3 years ago

Thanks for your edits, try to look out for the "square" option in the right click menu (or press Q) to make the buildings have square corners.

118375694 over 3 years ago

Unrelated to the above discussion, you've added a couple of objects with phone=pole (and no other tags)
It's not clear what you've meant by this, is it something like
man_made=utility_pole
utility=telecom

or

man_made=mast
tower:type=communication
communication:mobile_phone=yes

phone= should only be for the phone number of an object

118708720 over 3 years ago

Hi, I'm not sure what you were using to do the matching here, but something has gone a bit wrong.
e.g. node/306487035 which has fhrs:id=1473267 but should link to https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1472655

There's something similar for a lot of objects in Cambridge, and not just in this changeset.

https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhodot/?lat=52.20582&lon=0.12772&zoom=13&layer=fhrs

A lot of the red dots are from issues like this.

Using OSMCha these seem to be the changesets from that session, which include the affected elements (I'm not sure if every element is mismatched or not).
changeset/118673427
changeset/118565161
changeset/118565001
changeset/118315177
changeset/118314501
changeset/118276178
changeset/118275973

119045425 over 3 years ago

It seems odd for
way/1046011963/ to have a phone number tagged but no other feature tagged.

119613762 over 3 years ago

It probably needs a path adding in front of the houses, but it's not visible from aerial due to the trees

119034058 over 3 years ago

Somehow moved some objects, reverted in changeset/119034173

119032748 over 3 years ago

Comment should read "Change building=terrace with singular housenumber to building=house with house=terraced"

110222964 over 3 years ago

It sounds like you're saying that ABetterRoutePlanner is unaware of addr:housename, this sounds like a bug there and shouldn't be dealt with by duplicated tagging in OSM data.

I disagree with your point about name there, as it is still duplicating data.

I'm happy to disagree though

110222964 over 3 years ago

I'm not sure I understand what sort of situation you are referring to.

In my mind if a house has addr:housename but not addr:housenumber then nohousenumber=yes is implied

I don't think that having a duplicate name changes that at all

118107557 almost 4 years ago

I'm not sure how you managed it, but in this and another changeset you had a non-printing character between the sections of the postcodes for a couple of places (S36 7JW and S36 7JY)
I've fixed them, but something to watch out for in future

118563662 almost 4 years ago

No worries, I was browsing recent notes

118564433 almost 4 years ago

See details here
https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/geographicalproducts/nationalstatisticsaddressproducts
Someone made a layer for JOSM, which is what I mostly use, I can probably find the info if you're interested

110693770 almost 4 years ago

You marked way/529207530/
as a hotel, when it is a residential area.
If there is a hotel there then it should be mapped as its own separate building. (I have reverted it to residential area)

Also, see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments to let other people know what you are mapping and why