Hi, thanks for adding this pavement.
Just a few notes, its name isn't "Street Pavement" - that's a description of what it is that is already covered by other tags you've used.
Also, you don't need to set motor_vehicle=no as that is assumed for all paths

Hi, looks like you've got a typo on the postcode here, can you fix it please?

On these two houses
way/911248266
way/911248275
you've put GB as the postcode, I'm sure that was meant for the country, but do you know the actual postcodes?

Something seems to have gone wrong with the postcodes on these, can you retrieve the data?

Hi and welcome to OSM.
You requested a review of this and it mostly looks good to me.
When we tag colours, they should be in all lowercase, I've fixed that for you here.
Happy mapping!

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Couple of things:
You've tagged this section as a path, but from aerial imagery it looks more like a service road.
Tagging it as private is the right thing if there's no public access, although the gate at the north east end was already tagged as being private (that doesn't mean that the road shouldn't be tagged as private too).
You got a warning about the waterway and path crossing which should be fixed. The A1 above there is mapped as a bridge, so I think the path/road you added should not be a tunnel (like the cycle path next to it isn't).

Hi, you requested a review of this and it seems good to me, if that route isn't used any more.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it all looks good to me. It would be good to add the postcode too, if you know it.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You requested a review of this, and my only comment would have been about the address, but you've since fixed that, so all looks good to me!

Hi, you requested a review of this and it all looks good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
My only comment is that it would be helpful if your changeset description was a bit clearer as to what you've corrected.

Looks good to me

Looks good

Looks good

This looks good too.
Again, a better description would be appreciated.

Hi, you requested a review of this.
It seems that the road you added would be better marked as a service road, and could also extend a bit further, right into the car park. You could also map the outline of the car park too.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
Just a comment, it would be nice if you could be more specific in your changeset descriptions.
i.e. here you could have said something like "Added apartment building"

Hi and welcome to OSM! You requested a review of this and it all seems good to me.

Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks mostly good to me.
Your changeset comment seems to have been cut off a bit.
In your comment you've linked to Google Maps, but remember we can't copy things from there (including not copying from street view) into OSM (you very much imply local knowledge so I'm sure you haven't).

At the moment, the path cuts through fences, so they should be corrected.

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
If there's a pavement along the road, then you might consider the cycleway or sidewalk tags:
cycleway=*
sidewalk=*