Your tag for "basin" of "stormwater" isn't listed on the wiki
basin=*?uselang=en-GB
But has been used about 600 times in the UK, so maybe the wiki needs updating with a description of what's meany by this.
I don't know anything about this pond, so don't know if any of those three tags listed (which make up 92% of usage) would be suitable.

Does this path meet the bridleway at all before its eastern end?
It seems a little odd that they run very close and parallel for several hundred metres, or is there something between them?

On this one, you've left this bit:
way/750300811
as a service road, I think it should be a residential road too, as it seems to be going through houses and connecting other residential roads together.
(Perhaps these last few changes could have been in one changeset, updating the names of several roads.)

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good

Looks good. Best to remove the "construction=residential" tag as well as changing the highway value.

Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me.
I agree that a different, named road leading to houses should be residential, not driveway.

Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Similar to the one before, this still has the construction tag set as residential, and that should be removed whether or not you leave this as service.

Hi, you requested a review of this, it all looks good to me

Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
The road that you changed has been mapped that it was a residential road under construction (highway=construction, construction=residential), and you've made it a service road.
From aerial imagery it looks like residential road might be most appropriate, but say you've surveyed it, so happy to go with your judgement there.

Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Have you checked this in person, or are you just basing the fact that these are bridleways on OS maps? Remember you can't copy other map data into OSM.
In terms of how things are rendered, that depends on which map display you use.
If you want to keep the track type (or service road, or whatever) then there are designation tags you can use, see here for details: osm.wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways

The detail to the car park looks good.
Something went odd there with the path though, it looks like you moved the node with the gate on, which then changed the whole retail area outline.
Best to either draw a new path and then merge it, or continue the line from the gate node.
Also, not sure why you deleted the parking aisle road, as that was what I had meant you should connect the path to.
I've fixed these things for you here.

In terms of names not showing up, that depends on where you're viewing the map data. There are a huge variety of renderings and apps that use OSM data. I assume you're talking here about the default rendering on the OSM website though. It can take a day or two to refresh, and also a decision is made about what's more important to show when things would overlap. So here it seems to be showing the name of the residential area rather than the house name.
Don't be tempted to change tags or locations of things just to make it "look nice" here though: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I don't represent OSM in any way, just another mapper. I was just reviewing some changesets.
I wasn't meaning that you should specify every single change you've made, but just a description of what you've done in that changeset (in particular all of your changesets had the same description, so it's helpful to understand the difference between all of them).
See here for more detail osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments.3F
Not sure why you feel the need to delete accounts, but whatever.
Also, just to say that your more recent changeset descriptions are much better, so thanks for adding more detail there.

Thanks for fixing this. Just a note, on the wiki it says that the ways across the bridge should be tagged with bridge and the same layer as the bridge, and should also connect to the edge of the bridge outline. I've fixed that for you here.
Also, just to confirm that it isn't possible to get from the path to the road at all here? If it is possible then there needs to be a connection of some sort to enable routing.

Hi, you requested a review of this, and it's me again.
Looks goo (partly because it's exactly what I suggested).
Couple of comments, first there is a type for car park (select the car park then search for feature type), then remove its name or if it does have a signed name then set it to that instead, and it probably doesn't make sense for the car park to have an address either.
Also, I may have just missed this last time (and it wasn't actually you that added it), but the footpath to the north west of the farm shop currently doesn't connect through. For the sake of apps and such like that do directions it's important for paths to connect to other paths or roads. From the aerial imagery it looks like it goes round the east side of the building.

Hi, you requested a review of this.
Looks good to me, good to make sure that new developments are added quickly, and looks like you've added lots of suitable tags to the roads.
I assume from your comment that the development isn't quite finished, so the surrounding construction area is probably still suitable.

One thing, this little bit of road:
way/907032414
doesn't have a name, if it's part of either Pheasant Avenue or Goldcrest Drive then it could be merged with the appropriate one.

Hi, you requested a review of this. Thanks for adding this building, always good to make sure things like that are up to date.
First, it's best to square the corners (Q) (or use the buildings plugin tool in JOSM) to make drawing squared buildings easier.
Also, because there are 'holes' in the outline of the building, it needs to be a multipolygon. Go to Tools > Create multipolygon.
Also, there was a leftover node just tagged with the name of the building.
I've done these things for you here.