OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
131548872 almost 3 years ago

To add to previous comments, I have fixed the road issue in this changeset because it could affect routing applications:changeset/131868508. @miloneevyas19 - please be careful with your edits and do not ignore warnings and errors.

129379726 almost 3 years ago

Again, you've added random features. Why? There's no farm here. Please only add things that exist.

129391489 almost 3 years ago

Welcome to OSM. I see you've been making edits, but why are your edits spread across such a large area? Also, what does 'Answer3' mean? Why have you ignored the warnings made by OSM?

125146690 almost 3 years ago

Hi! Welcome to OSM. It's great that you're adding buildings and other details to OSM. However, there are quite a few buildings which have been drawn very strangely.

For example,
way/1087706853#map=19/18.54731/73.79930 - these are very clearly tqo different buildings, and eight of them have diagonal walls. Please go through articles which define how buildings should be drawn, for example: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

130643475 almost 3 years ago

Hi! Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Why have you changed the classification for this way to Residential from Tertiary? Please read the highway tagging schema for India: osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway

130366607 almost 3 years ago

Hey there! I agree with keeping changesets small. The change I made was basically trying to revert fictional changes made by another user, which spanned a region in my city. Did not realise that the changeset made by the previous user extended across such a large extent. Given the nature of changes which led me to revert, it is safe to assume that the original changesets were of a bad nature.

128718298 about 3 years ago

Welcome to OSM! Why have you moved a bus stop to an incorrect location, and added points with random numbers?

128718668 about 3 years ago

Hi there! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've made edits in the map, and that's great but all of your edits do not add value to the map, do not follow tagging conventions or are downright fictional. I'm reverting your changes, but please go through guidelines on https://learnosm.org/en/ before you make changes in the future. Also, kindly approach the OSM community if you have questions.

130139720 about 3 years ago

Kindly remove this bad edit at the earliest, else if you are not sure - happy to do it for you.

130139720 about 3 years ago

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've added a waterway, which does not exist and has created multiple tags that don't exist.

Since OSM is used by many different users for critical use cases such as routing and map tiles, it is important that you only add information you know is to be true and is valid. Please go through https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you have not already.

Your changeset comment "dm&g sa" also does not provide any information about what you are actually editing. Please go through good practice guidelines: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments

128718343 about 3 years ago

Why have you added all names in CAPS? Most of these already exist in the database - why have they been duplicated?

128716957 about 3 years ago

Hello! Again, almost every single added point already has a POI present there. You have also marked several points as "Hospital". Why is that? If you know a hospital exists at that location, why have you not added the name? If you do not know the name, why state the name as "Hospital"?

129387400 about 3 years ago

Hello. You seem to have added a false hospital of name 'ddddd'. Why is that? What is the point of adding fake data to the map? Please remove the point, or add correct information.

128718317 about 3 years ago

I've noticed that you've added POIs right next to existing POIs. Why is that? If there was additional information that could have been added to the POIs, why was that not done instead?

Please go through osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

128717844 about 3 years ago

I've noticed that you've added POIs right next to existing POIs. Why is that? If there was additional information that could have been added to the POIs, why was that not done instead?

Please go through osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

128719448 about 3 years ago

Hello, and welcome to OSM. I see that you've been adding a lot of data, which is good. However, almost all of the edits are of bad quality, such as buildings added on top of existing buildings, spelling mistakes in names, roads being moved around, and buildings being of random shapes, not squared off or going over roads. You don't see this in real life, do you?

Please go through the OSM beginners guide: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

If you have questions on how you should make edits, please approach the community: https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/

Remember that this is a shared space and the map is used by everyone in that area, and also for use cases such as navigation. It is therefore critical that the changes we make to the map are in good faith and helpful. I've reverted many of the changes you made which had damaged the existing map, but I suggest you go through them and ask yourself - is this making the map better?

128213325 about 3 years ago

Hi nafis21
Is there a reason why you have edited roads like this? What is the meaning behind the changeset comment 'stackbox'? I see that your image source is Bing maps, but your roads do not align to Bing Maps images at all.

What does the source = stackbox mean? Is this source open and verifiable?

Is this an organised editing effort? If so, who is in charge of the activity?

128272820 about 3 years ago

Hi Kanhaia
I see that you've been adding roads to OSM, which is great. However, the source says StackBOX everywhere. Is this a publicly available source, or what is the significance of the source?

Also, all changeset comments just seem to say StackBOX. What does this mean? Please go through the OSM guidelines on changeset guidelines: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also, I notice that StackBox seems to be a company. In this case, please follow the organised editing guidelines if there are multiple people editing OSM as part of an organised editing group: osm.wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

88657440 about 3 years ago

This is not a swamp area. I see similar random landcover marked nearby. Since what is drawn here does not match ground reality, I'm reverting edits which do not match ground reality in this area.

Can you provide an explanation about why these edits were made?

126505097 about 3 years ago

Hello
Welcome to OSM! I see that you've been editing buildings across the map and that's a great start. However, I've noticed that even though you have been using Bing Maps as the imagery, your buildings do not match the imagery. Have you read the guidelines about drawing buildings? osm.wiki/Roof_modelling
If not, please do. I also noticed that your buildings are snapped to roads. When you do this, then that is incorrect. Roads never touch buildings in real life, do they? They go under or above maybe but do not touch buildings. Please go through the beginner's guide to OSM before making any further edits: osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Also, I noticed all of your changeset comments say "newedit". That is not a descriptive changeset comment. You should always describe what you are editing, why you are editing, etc. Please read through osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments to understand how to add meaningful changeset comments.

Remember that OSM is a community effort, and is used by millions of people, companies and organisations worldwide so it is important that your contributions are meaningful. If you are not sure of how to proceed, please approach the OSM India community https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/