brianboru's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 10713143 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for the tip Jerry. Moor Street viaduct fixed - I've joined the across member ways to the outline member |
| 54893248 | over 7 years ago | Relation has been successfully recovered |
| 54893248 | over 7 years ago | Please be careful - this changeset has deleted the entire relation for the Warwickshire Centenary Way! It's going to be hard work recreating it. |
| 53191287 | over 7 years ago | This footpath is a public right of way according to Warwicks CC. You have it as access=no. Do you mean no access for vehicles? |
| 53191361 | over 7 years ago | This footpath is a public right of way according to Warwicks CC. You have it as access=no. Do you mean no access for vehicles? |
| 58576517 | over 7 years ago | The post Office on the N side between the cafe and Nisa Local is the current post ofice (surveyed), I forgot to delete the old Post Office next to the theatre |
| 27756392 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for spotting this error. Please go ahead and correct it ( and any others like this you come across - no need to go through changeset comments for my edits - I'm not precious about them) |
| 57525644 | over 7 years ago | Thanks Jan. How did I manage to enter that gibberish on the post box! Now corrected. Good to know someone's doing QA
|
| 54592247 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for the warning. I was wondering why JOSM was behaving like that |
| 53736833 | about 8 years ago | Mike I'm not sure what I meant and I can't even remember if this footway is open or not so I just deleted the tag Regards Brian |
| 7985291 | about 8 years ago | No problem. Go ahead |
| 50839797 | about 8 years ago | Apologies for the misunderstanding |
| 50839797 | about 8 years ago | So please tell me where this data s published and under what licence? Please also explain the meaning of each tag as I requested - it would be best to point me to a wiki page where the data schema is laid out and even better if you could direct me to a discussion thread where the local community and the tagging community discussed this I'm impressed that you claim to have manually entered 12 new tags on 92 relations in this changeset - it must have taken hours. |
| 53170042 | about 8 years ago | Hi Ed There were no access restrictions on the road which is why I changed it back. There was a "Road Closed" sign which you could easily drive around for access so I thought it best to leave it as unclassified until the position clarifies itslelf ( there's also access to the British Transport Police Station to bear in mind) |
| 50839797 | about 8 years ago | Can you tell me what all these new tags mean? And what is the source? And if this is an import? |
| 52221600 | about 8 years ago | Hi Thanks for your input, This is the data supplied by the local authority, which I retagged according to the wiki except for these two tags which the wiki didn't address- - hence the new tags. The key attribute I note is only a proposed key and radar is a better known term AFAIK than nks in the UK |
| 48363783 | over 8 years ago | This footpath seems to be mistaken for a power line? |
| 50920302 | over 8 years ago | Thanks Jan - what happened here I don't know! Corrected now |
| 47045889 | over 8 years ago | We now have a big blank space for landuse as you've deleted the multipolygon and not replaced it. How far does the construction site extend? |
| 46860931 | over 8 years ago | This is now documented for discussion at
|