OpenStreetMap
bhousel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 49974110 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49931291 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49875319 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49804842 | over 8 years ago | Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49700420 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49691059 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49548374 | over 8 years ago | Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49565075 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49601298 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49486629 | over 8 years ago | Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 46561481 | over 8 years ago | Hi granpueblo, I notice that you are reclassifying a lot of the roads across New Jersey. Many of us in New Jersey are using this criteria for road classification: osm.wiki/New_Jersey#Classifications The state already does generally assign 500 and 600 numbers based on a road's importance in the overall network. When you drop roads down from primary to tertiary, it can cause issues with data consumers that try to route vehicles down primary arterials. I've also noticed in several places that you haven't reclassified the link roads, causing a bunch of errors in Q/A tools like keepright (e.g. now we have primary_link ways connecting residential and a tertiary) I appreciate your enthusiasm for mapping but can you roll back the road classifications to their previous versions? Thanks, Bryan |
| 49382679 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49228385 | over 8 years ago | Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 49009593 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I cleaned up the shape a little bit and tagged it with the "Wetland" preset. |
| 49072935 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 48933553 | over 8 years ago | Thanks systemerror, I do notice that the features show up on the DigitalGlobe Premium and Standard imagery layers, which seems to be newer than Bing here. (btw, the "flood plain" is normally tagged in OSM as a "basin". I will make the change for you, thanks and welcome!) |
| 48854754 | over 8 years ago | 👏 |
| 39582344 | over 8 years ago | juliaj, OpenStreetMap goes by what is on the sign, not necessarily what is the "official" name. A user with local knowledge of this area has told me that it is signed both ways, and so a more appropriate tag to use is `alt_name`. Thanks! |
| 48406207 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 48411786 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |