OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64710081 almost 7 years ago

Hi reflexz. Thank you for the message. I have removed the buildings using newer imagery from Esri.

65482806 about 7 years ago

Hi muralito, Mapillary does not show any signage indicating there is a left turn restriction. The existing turn restriction was preventing users from turning south onto Avenida Los Quilmes (way/324772495), which is why I removed the relation.

63685680 about 7 years ago

Great, look forward to hearing from you. Thanks!

64189068 about 7 years ago

Hi JKHougaard, I noticed you deleted the primary link (adjacent to way/527043298) that connected Århusvej to Lunbakkevej. SDFE aerial imagery and Mapillary both confirm there is a physical barrier separating the road. Can you please confirm if this link no longer exists?

63685680 about 7 years ago

Hi mikkolukas, I noticed you added a construction tag on way/301270578 based on your observation, and was wondering if you could confirm if the segment has reopened?

64904459 about 7 years ago

I will keep that in mind and leave more detailed changeset comments. Thanks!

64904459 about 7 years ago

Hello Hjart,

I was using the osm.wiki/Relation:restriction policy.

The way/509015727 was originally set as the “to” member of a no_left_turn relation when in fact the way functions as a straight-through connection, not left turn. This why I changed it to a “only_straight_on” relation. The restriction will still function the same.

Thanks,
berms

63316546 about 7 years ago

Hi JKHougaard, I added back the Bag Rådhuset segment for emergency vehicle access as advised. Thank you for the helpful feedback.

63024611 over 7 years ago

Hi, yes, the image I used was from Digital Globe from August 1, 2018.

59549709 over 7 years ago

Thank you for the message. I see where the issue was created which caused a gap and intersection between the wood multipolygon ways. I appreciate you making the correction.

59550890 over 7 years ago

I see that the wetland was accidentally collapsed. Thank you for making the correction and bringing it to my attention.

56624661 almost 8 years ago

Hi mweper. Thank you for the helpful feedback! The reason I was using DG Premium is because the DG Premium Vintage grid data is actually showing as more recent imagery. I would agree with you that Bing imagery is too outdated in this area to use. Going forward, I’ll consider both DG imagery tile sets. Also, thank you for also suggesting the GPS traces that you provided! I’ll take a look.

Regards,
berms