berms's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114632462 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you for notifying me and correcting the direction. |
| 114410285 | about 4 years ago | Apologies for the mistake. The road appeared to be bidirectional in this Mapillary link https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=273818454444635. I have reverted my edit back to oneway. Thanks for the feedback. |
| 112812599 | about 4 years ago | Hi 4004, thanks for the feedback. I removed the redundant foot tag from the ways. |
| 112970334 | about 4 years ago | Hi Rico557, According to OSM wiki, ways without an explicit value are assumed to have layer 0. However, it appears that the footway travels underneath the railway and already had a "tunnel" tag, which is why I changed it to -1. I realize this has changed back and forth, so I will leave the final decision to your discretion. |
| 112710352 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for pointing that out and correcting it. |
| 65966996 | about 4 years ago | Thank for the helpful feedback. |
| 109109464 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for the correction. |
| 66435138 | over 5 years ago | Hello, thank you for reaching out. Although I have not edited in Moldova for over a year, I have been made aware of this information and will be sure to discuss any future editing with the Moldovan OSM community. I appreciate your valuable input and willingness to help. |
| 66437102 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for the information. |
| 86787892 | over 5 years ago | Hi Veska. I noticed that you changed a large section on the М5 to trunk, but it looks like there were some gaps leftover (way/280309383, way/749717229, way/599380183 for example). I was wondering if this was intentional or if they should match their neighboring classification? |
| 80599841 | over 5 years ago | Hi PelleV. Thank you for sharing your perspective. I appreciate your feedback. |
| 84715069 | over 5 years ago | Hi 4004, thank you for the message. I changed the ways back to secondary. |