There was a big duplicated railway segment, which I labeled to delete. I forgot to re-label the one segment in question which was retained

Thanks for the tip.

There are two issues here:

1) The legal (watershed) boundary for Yoho Park is incorrectly described in the Parks Act to terminate on the Alberta-B.C border at Mount Rhondda. However, the actual watershed joins the continental divide north of Mount Rhondda. I moved the Yoho border north to be hydrologically more accurate, and removed the redundant north Mount Rhondda.

2) I am not sure why "Yoho Park doesn't render". If you view "relation/9368703", the entire Yoho Park boundary is depicted. The parameters are the same as adjacent parks. If I zoom in (14), the boundary is visible.

ciao,
Baden

Thanks for removing this without notification, I know it must have been a huge burr in your butt!

While you're at it, could you remove all those "hires" lines in Asia?

thanks,
Baden

Hola Sr. VP:

Yes, I had temporarily changed the park boundary to a road to enable it to be visible on other maps, specifically OpenTopoMap and Sentinel2.

I will need to review the boundary section that I re-drew to correlate deviations with the other maps.

Thanks for reminding me,
Baden

Read what I wrote, it applies to you!

Hello Mr. aquarix:

This is interesting. I could not see anywhere in the change set where china is involved. I also know I occasionally have problems in Go Map!!, as the last entry is defaulted. If management were concerned about this, rectifying the locale would be easy, and it would probably be automated.

Besides this, I cannot see a problem for anyone else, unless they are self appointed "OSM Policia". Unless someone had nothing better to do than follow me around to see what I had done, it would not be an issue. Politeness for those folks would be an absolute zero priority

thanks
Baden

Sorry, I originally checked last night, however, now it is good. {:-)

thanks,
Baden

Hi:

I am not sure how to address this, but there are now 2 duplicate AB-BC border segments (Way: AB-BC (48622354). I could remove one, but I thought it would be best to let you deal with it.

thanks,
Baden

Hola VP:

I made a plot of the reservoir levels for you:

http://baden.nu/Abraham_Lake_Level.gif

gracias,
Baden

Hola VP:

Thanks for the notice. I think I see what might have transpired. The river basins in the Rockies are a mess, so I was cleaning them up, specifically relabeling braided streams.

relation/6684472#map=10/52.1453/-116.7174

As you may see, this 'riverbank' is a bit of a monster. I will attempt to split this object up to correct the issue.

FWIW, I do not think the reservoir is full very often, as it is primarily used for flood abatement.

thanks,
Baden

You are most correct! What do you think these are? Maybe you did not notice that I never stated "wrong"? Someone already deleted the other adjacent similar object.

thanks,
Baden

Everything on and inside this change set is fictitious. Was this intentional?

Thanks,
Baden

Hi Stromo:

I have mainly been correcting the PDL:

a) adding (copying) all the relevant railway tags
b) correcting alignments
c) adding points and splitting lines
d) adding/changing tags for bridges/viaducts, tunnels, embankments, etc
e) deleting erroneous tags such as 50 KV
f) deleting redundant alignments and points

Additionally, I have occasionally corrected nearby road and river alignments which were notably misaligned.

I have been using "Go Map" on ios to copy tags over (a), which is manageable. The primary activity which may be
easier accomplished in JSOM is deleting the incorrect tags such as (e) above, which were manually deleted on every way.

thanks,
Baden

Hi Glassman:

Thanks for your concern.

The most I can state is that I would not be constructing administrative boundaries. It looks like I may have edited the boundary to differentiate it from the road I was correcting the alignment on adjacent to the refinery.

You would probably know a lot more about the area and the way than I would.

thanks,
Baden

Here is another good paper:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Weihua_Zhao5/publication/274071020_Route_Alignment_and_Optimization_of_Railway_Based_on_Geological_Condition/links/55141a900cf283ee0834a58e/Route-Alignment-and-Optimization-of-Railway-Based-on-Geological-Condition.pdf?origin=publication_detail

This whole tunnel routing subject is difficult to deal with. At best, information is sparse, and routes need to be inferred. High speed routes are easier, as the radii are very large, so the freedom is restricted. It would be appreciated to have some design documentation. As can be seen from the above link, the actual routing can be complex.

This Chengdu - Lanzhou line is interesting, and I question its justification. I do not think there is a real logistical requirement for it, as new rail lines already go to Guangyuan and from there to Lanzhou. In fact, this new line joins the existing line at Hadapu. I understand there is a desire for economic stimulus for the area, but I also think there is a large engineering challenge which the rail bureau aspires to master.

thanks,
Baden

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Runqiu_Huang/publication/257704760_Engineering_geological_assessment_for_route_selection_of_railway_line_in_geologically_active_area_A_case_study_in_China/links/55e9accf08ae3e121843bcf3/Engineering-geological-assessment-for-route-selection-of-railway-line-in-geologically-active-area-A-case-study-in-China.pdf

I hope this works,
thanks,
Baden

Hi Doug:

I thought I would give you a benefit of doubt, and I scanned the CNR route from the Calgary outskirts to the end of the line, and found no apparent abnormalities, so maybe you could offer some more specifics?

thanks,
Baden

I needed to re-trace the Rianila River path, as I had inadvertently straightened it.

Baden

Hi Chetan:
Thanks for the notice! I think the change may have occurred when the editor barfed when I tried to merge two river sections that were too big.
I am not familiar with how to revert the errant change. What would be required? I could map the whole river again if needed, but that would not be too elegant.

Hi:

I am not sure what this (blue) object is, what function it has, or how to change it. The highway nodes it is/was on are complete. Possibly, it was a private trace that should not have been public?

Maybe if you understand all this, it might be easier for you to modify or delete the blue object?

thanks,
Baden